1910.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 649 



The above-mentioned records are the first for the species from 

 North Carolina. At Raleigh it occurred in gardens, pastures, in 

 broomstraw fields, in open places in woods and under rubbish, while 

 at Edenton it was taken among weeds in a wet spot. 

 (Eoanthus angustipennis Fitch. 



A single male from Sulphur Springs, taken September 29, 1904, is 

 the first record of the species from North Carolina. An immature 

 individual secured at Bayville, Va., August 19, 1908, constitutes the 

 first Virginia record for the species. 

 CEcanthus latipennis Riley. 



A female individual in the istar preceding the adult condition taken 

 August 19, 1998, at Bayville, Va., is the first record of the species in 

 that State. It was taken in pine woods undergrowth. 

 (Eoanthus quadripunctatus Beutenmiiller. 



Four males and two females from Raleigh, taken June 29, August 

 30 and September 22. 1904, and one female from Sulphur Springs, 

 September 24, 1904, represent this species. At Raleigh it occurred 

 on garden weeds, in broomstraw and in upland fields. 



Two males and one female were taken in heavy tangles among low 

 dunes at Cape Henry, Va., August 18, 1908, these constituting the 

 first Virginia record for the species. 



(Eoanthus nigricornis Walker.- 5 



Two females taken at Raleigh, September 7 and 22, 1904. represent 

 this rather robust species. One was taken in an upland field, the 

 other from alders along stream in pine woods. 



This is the first record of the species from North Carolina. 

 Anaxipha exigua (Say). 



Three males and two females taken at Raleigh, August 30 and 

 September 9, 1904, belong to this species. Two males and two females 

 secured at Bayville, Va., August 19, 1908, constitute the first record 

 of the species in the latter State. At Raleigh it was captured in 

 grasses around edge of swamp, while at Bayville it was taken in tall 

 grass and brush in a wet spot in pine w r oods. 



Phylloscyrtus pulchellus (Uhler). 



This beautiful species is represented by three males and two females 

 taken at Raleigh, September 9, 1904, and a single female captured at 



25 We find it impossible to use the name fasciatus for this species, as Fitch 

 did not propose it as a new name, but merely erroneously identified De Geer's 

 Gryllus fasciatus which is clearly a Nemobius. After examining the literature, 

 we fully agree with previous authors who have reached this conclusion. 



