MILIOLININAE 315 



although it has no very distinctive specific features. The specimens agree very well 

 with d'Orbigny's figures, but, except at WS 217, the surface of the shell is invariably 

 dull and rough, whereas d'Orbigny describes it as being bright and shining. The Type 

 was not to be found in Paris. 



14. Miliolina vulgaris (d'Orbigny). 



Ouinqueloculina vulgaris, d'Orbigny, 1826, TMC, p. 302, no. 33. 



Quinqueloculina vulgaris, Schlumberger, 1893, MGM, p. 65 (in the reprints, p. 207), pi. ii, 



figs. 65-6, and woodcuts 13-14. 



Seven stations: 388; WS 71, 84, 87, 88, 89, 215. 



Common. Very fine and typical specimens at WS 87, identical with the Type- 

 specimens in Paris. The figure in Soldani (S. 1789-98, T, pt iii, tab. 152, fig. E), upon 

 which d'Orbigny based his species, is highly unsatisfactory, but d'Orbigny's localities, 

 principally Mediterranean, were sufficient to justify Schlumberger in his identifications 

 when he revived the name. 



I 



5. Miliolina oblonga (Montagu). 



Vermiailum oblongiim, Montagu, 1803-8, TB, p. 522, pi. xiv, fig. 9. 



Miliolina seminulum var. ubloiiga, WiUiamson, 1858, RFGB, p. 86, pi. vii, figs. i86, 187. 



Miliolina seminulum, Brady, 1884, FC, p. 160, pi. v, fig. 4. 



Nine stations: 388; WS 71, 79, 84, 86, 87, 88, 90, 93. 



Common. The best specimens at WS 87 and 88, where a complete series of indi- 

 viduals, from immature young to very large adult specimens, was obtained. The dominant 

 type at all the stations is rather small and square-ended, a parallelogram with rounded 

 corners. 



16. Miliolina bosciana (d'Orbigny). 



Ouinqueloculina bosciana, d'Orbigny, 1839, FC, p. 191, pi. xi, figs. 22-4. 

 Miliolina bosciana. Chapman, 1900, FLF, p. 177, pi. xix, fig. 7. 



One station: WS 88. 



Typical specimens, rather thick-shelled, and quite in conformity with the Type in 

 Paris. 



17. Miliolina procera, Goes. 



Miliolina procera. Goes, 1896, DOA, p. 82, pi. vii, figs. 7-9. 



Miliolina procera, Cushman, 1910, etc., FNP, 1917, p. 45, pi. xix, fig. 2. 



Two stations: WS 210, 215. 



Two fine specimens from WS 215, and three from WS 210, agree very well with the 

 figures of Goes, and even exhibit the faint longitudinal striation to which he refers in his 

 text, but which is not shown in his figures. The aperture in all our specimens is normal, 

 and not the undulating irregular slit which Goes reports as being usually characteristic 

 of the species. 



