712 BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION 



47. McClelland, T. B. Studies of the photoperiodism of some economic plants. 

 Jour. Agric. Res. 37: 603-628. 1928. 



48. McPhee, Hugh C. The influence of environment on sex in hemp Cannabis 

 sativa L. Jour. Agric. Res. 28: 1067-1080. 1924. 



49. MocHKOv, B. S. On the question of photoperiodism of certain woody species. 

 Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet, and Plant Breeding [Leningrad] 23 : 479-510. 1930. 



50. MuRNEEK, A. E. The internal mechanism of photoperiodism. Missouri Agric. 

 Exp. Sta. Bull. 310: 44-45. 1932. 



51. Nightingale, G. T. The chemical composition of plants in relation to photo- 

 periodic changes. Wisconsin Agric. Exp. Res. Bull. 74. 68 pp. 1927. 



52. Oden, Sven. Plant growth in electric light. Kungl. Landtbr. Akad. Handl. o. 

 Tidskr. 68 : 897-1057. 1929. 



53. Pfeiffer, Norma E. Microchemical and morphological studies of effect of 

 light on plants. Botan. Gaz. 81 : 173-195. 1926. 



54. Ramaley, Francis. Some caryophyllaceous plants influenced in growth and 

 structure by artificial illumination supplemental to daylight. Botan. Gaz. 92: 

 311-320. 1931. 



55. Ramaley, Francis. A working bibliography of day-length and artificial illumi- 

 nation as affecting growth of seed plants. Colorado Univ. Studies 20 : 257-263. 

 1933. 



56. Rane, F. William. Electroculture with the incandescent lamp. West Virginia 

 Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 37. 1894. 27 pp. 



57. Rasumov, V. J. tJber die photoperiodische Nachwirkung im Zusammenhang 

 mit der Wirkung verschiedener Aussaattermine auf die Pflanzen. Planta, Arch. 

 Wiss. Bot. 10 : 345-373. 1930. 



58. Rasumov, V. J. Influence of alternate day length on tuber formation. Bull. 

 Appl. Bot. Genet., and Plant Breeding [Leningrad] 27 : 3-46. 1931. 



59. Rasumov, V. J. On the localization of the photoperiodical stimulation. Bull. 

 Appl. Bot. Genet., and Plant Breeding [Leningrad] 27 : 249-282. 1931. 



60. Redington, G. The effect of the duration of light upon the growth and develop- 

 ment of the plant. Biol. Rev. and Biol. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 4 : 180-208. 

 1929. 



61. Redington, G., and J. H. Priestley. A study of the effect of diurnal periodicity 

 upon fibre production. Leeds Philos. Soc. Proc. 1 : 17-26. 1925. 



62. ScHAFFNER, JoHN H. Sex reversal and the experimental production of neutral 

 tassels in Zea Mays. Botan. Gaz. 90: 279-298. 1930. 



63. ScHAFFNER, JoHN H. The fluctuation curve of sex reversal in staminate hemp 

 plants induced by photoperiodicity. Amer. Jour. Bot. 18: 424-430. 1931. 



64. Schick, R. Der Einfluss der Tageslange auf die Knollenbildung der Kartoffel. 

 Zuchter 3 : 365-369. 1931. 



65. Schick, R. Photoperiodismus (Sammelreferat). Zuchter 4: 122-135. 1932. 



66. ScHiJBELER, F. Chr. The effects of uninterrupted sunlight on plants. Nature 

 21:311-312. 1880. 



67. Siemens, C. Wm. On some applications of electric energy to agricultural and 

 horticultural purpo.scs. British Ass'n. Adv. Sci. Rep. p. 474-480. 1881. 



68. SiGMOND, Hans. Uber das Aufbliihen von Hedera Helix L. und die Beeinflussung 

 dieses Vorganges durch das Licht. Botan. Centralbl. 46 : 68-91. 1929. 



69. Smith, Folmer. Researches on the influence of natural and artificial light 

 on plants. L On the influence of length of day. Meld. Norges Landbr. Hiskole 

 13: 1-228. 1933. 



70. Tageeva, Sophie. Zur Frage des Zusammenhangs zwischen Assimilation und 

 Ertragsfiihigheit. Planta, Arch. Wiss. Bot. 17: 758-793. 1932. 



71. TiNCKER, M. A. H. The effect of length of day upon the growth and reproduc- 

 tion of some economic plants. Ann. Bot. 39 : 721-754. 1925. 



