710 BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION 



6. AsHBY, Eric. The interaction of factors in the growth of Lemna. III. The 

 interrelationship of duration and intensity of light. Ann. Bot. 43 : 333-354. 1929. 



7. AucHTER, E. C, and C. P. Harley. Effect of various lengths of day on develop- 

 ment and chemical composition of some horticultural plants. Amer. Soc. Hort. 

 Sci. Proc. 1924: 199-214. 1924. 



8. Bailey, L. H. Greenhouse notes for 1892-93. I. Third report upon electro- 

 culture. Cornell New York Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 55: 147-157. 1893. 



9. Bonnier, G. Influence de la lumiere electrique continue sur la form et la struc- 

 ture des plantes. Rev. Gen. Bot. 7 : 241-257, 289-306, 332-342, 409-419. 1895. 



10. Borodin, Irene. The influence of nitrogenous and mineral nutrition on the time 

 of heading in barley and millet under the conditions of different day length. 

 Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet, and Plant Breeding [Leningrad] 27: 171-195. 1931. 



11. Bremer, A. H. Einfiuss der Tagesljinge auf die Wachstumphasen des Salats. 

 Genetische Untersuchungen. Gartenbauwiss. 4: 469-483. 1931. 



12. Clark, N. A. The rate of reproduction of Lemna major as a function of intensity 

 and duration of light. Jour. Phys. Chem. 29: 935-941. 1925. 



13. Corbett, L. C. a study of the effect of incandescent gas light on plant growth. 

 West Virginia Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 62: 77-110. 1899. 



14. Crist, J. W., and G. J. Stout. Relation between top and root size in herbaceous 

 plants. Plant Physiol. 4 : 63-85. 1929. 



15. Deats, Marian E. The effect on plants of the increase and decrease of the period 

 of illumination over that of the normal day period. Amer. Jour. Bot. 12 : 384-392. 

 1925. 



16. Dexter, S. T. Effect of several environmental factors on the hardening of plants. 

 Plant Physiol. 8: 123-139. 1933. 



17. Doroshenko, a. Photoperiodism of some cultivated forms in connection with 

 their origin. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet, and Plant Breeding [Leningrad] 17: 

 167-220. 1927. 



18. Doroshenko, A., E. D. Karpetchenko, and H. I. Nesterov. Influence of the 

 length of day on tuber set in potatoes and several other plants. Bull. Appl. Bot., 

 Genet, and Plant Breeding [Leningrad] 23: 31-60. 1929-1930. 



19. Doroshenko, A., and V. J. Rasumov. Photoperiodism of some cultivated forms 

 in connection with their geographical origin. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet, and 

 Plant Breeding [Leningrad] 22: 219-276. 1929. 



20. Enomoto, Nakae. On the phj^siological difference between the spring and 

 winter types in wheat and barley. Jour. Imp. Agr. Expt. Sta. Tokyo 1 : 107-139. 

 1929. 



21. Forster, H. C, M. A. H. Tincker, A. J. Vasey, and S. M. Wadham. Experi- 

 ments in England, Wales and Australia on the effect of length of day on various 

 cultivated varieties of wheat. Ann. Appl. Biol. 19: 378-412. 1932. 



21a. Garner, W. W. Comparative responses of long-day and short-day plants to 

 relative length of day and night. Plant Physiol. 8: 347-356. 1933. 



22. Garner, W. W., and H. A. Allard. Effect of the relative length of day and 

 night and other factors of the environment on growth and reproduction in plants. 

 Jour. Agric. Res. 18: 553-606. 1920. 



23. Garner, W. W., and H. A. Allard. Further studies in photoperiodism. The 

 respon.se of the plant to relative length of day and night. Jour. Agric. Res. 23: 

 871-920. 1923. 



24. Garner, W. W., and H. A. Allard. Localization of the response in plants to 

 relative length of day and night. Jour. Agric. Res. 31: 555-566. 1925. 



25. Garner, W. W., and H. A. Allard. Photoperiodic respon.se of soybeans in 

 relation to temperature and other environmental factors. Jour. Agric. Res. 41 : 

 719-735. 1930. 



