CAMPTOPLITES 4 6 s 



part of the type-colony at Amsterdam was also not available for examination owing to 

 the war. The British Museum type-specimen had, however, been examined several years 

 before during the preparation of the rest of this account of Camptoplites. 



5mm 



Fig. 53. A, B. Camptoplites lunatus Harmer. 1940.7.8. 1. Challenger St. 147, off Crozet Islands. The 

 same ovicell in oblique basal and frontal views. There is a break in the ectooecium. C. C, reticu- 

 lata (Busk). 87. 12.9. 187. Challenger St. 147, off Crozet Islands. Ovicell from type-specimen 

 D. C. asymmetncus sp.n. 87. 12.9. 188 1 . Challenger St. 320, off Patagonian Shelf. Ovicell from 

 paratype-specimen. 



d.z. distal zooecium, f.z. fertile zooecium, sp. spine. 



20. Camptoplites areolatus (Kluge). Figs. 54 A, B, 55 A, B. 

 Bugula areolata Kluge, 1914, p. 627, pi. xxviii, fig. 3, text-fig. 13. 

 Camptoplites areolatus Harmer, 1923, p. 300. 



? Bugula sp. var. variospinosa Kluge, 1914, p. 628, pi. xxviii, fig. 4. 

 ? Bugula reticulata Waters, 1904, p. 22; Calvet, 1909, p. 7, pi. i, fig. 3. 



