167 



Hamilton, IVenfworth, Co. [a) — In the Canadian Journal 1853. 

 Prof. Henry Croft gives the the following analysis of a water said to 

 be from Young's Spring at Hamilton: 



Chloride sodium "5098 



Sulphate soda i'SqSs 



" lime 1-1246 



" Magnesia 47799 



In 1000 parts of water g'n^S 



Specific gravity 1006.4 



Hawkesbury, PrescottCo. {a) — A well reported to be on lot 9 con. 6 

 township of Hawkesbury afforded a water which gave the following 

 result on partial analysis : 



Chloride sodium S'lyy 



Sulphate soda '083 



Carbonate soda i'2oo 



" lime '076 



" magnesia '063 



In 1000 parts of water 9'599 



As well as some undertermined bromides, iodides, boracic acid, 

 oxide of iron and silica. 



Kingston, Frontenac Co. (a) — In two borings made for water at 

 Morton's distillery in Kingston, mineral waters were encountered 

 specimens of which were examined by the Rev. Prof. Williamson of 

 Queen's College, Kingston, with the following results. 



Lower Well. Upper Well. 



Chloride sodium 5'2i5 29-864 



. " calcium 4010 12-894 



" magnesium 1763 ^'954 



Sulphate soda 2'44i 



lime '396 



magnesia '492 



Carbonate lime '40° '370 



" magnesia J '-87 



In 1000 parts of water 13 830 52-257 



Specific gravity - loio-o 1043-2 



London, Middlesex G'.— Unfortunately no data are at hand giving 



an accurate analysis of the water of the Sulphur spring at London. 



i^To be continued.) 





