SHUMARD — CATALOGUE OP PALEOZOIC FOSSILS. 369 



EL.^ACRINUS (continued). 



p. 295. — C7. H.— Bear Grass Creek, near Louisville, Ky. ; 

 Falls of Ohio. 



Conradi— Nucleocrinus Conradi, Hall, 1862. 15th Rep. Reg. State 

 Cab. N.York, p. 149.— U. H— Stafford, Genesee Co., New 

 York. 



elegans— Nucleocrinus elegans, Conrad, 1842. Jour. Acad. Nat. 

 Sci. Phil., vol. 8, p. 280.— Nucleocrinus Halli, Vanuxem, 

 p. 163.— N. elegans, Hall, 1862. 15th Rep. Reg. State Cab. 

 N. York, p. 147, pi. 1, fig. 14 & 15.— Ham.— Livingston Co., 

 New York. 



lucina— Nucleocrinus lucina, Hall, 1862. 15th Rep. Reg. State 

 Cab. N. York, p. 148, pi. 1, fig. 16.— Ham.— Livingston Co., 

 New York. 



Verneuili— Pentremites Verneuili, Troost, 1841. 6th Geol. Rep. 

 Tenn. — Pentremites carioides, Owen, 1843. Cat. Geol. 

 Spec. Ohio Valley.— Olivanites Verneuili, Troost, 1849. 

 List Crin. Tenn. in Proc. Amer. Assoc. Camb. Meet., p. 62. 

 — Olivanites globosus, id.ib. — Pentremites Verneuili (Bea- 

 dle), D'Orb. Prod. Paloeont., vol. i., p. 102.— Elccacrinus 

 Verneuili, Roemer, 1851. Monog. Blastoid., p. 50, pi. 5, fig. 

 1. — 1856. Leth. Geog. Kohlen Gebirg., p. 284, taf. 4, fig. 

 10.— Olivanites Verneuili, Lvon, 1857. Geol. Surv. Ken- 

 tucky, vol. iii., p. 490, pi. 5, fig. 1.— Nucleocrinus, Lyon & 

 Casseday, 1859. Proc. Amer. Ac, vol. iv., p. 295.— Elcea- 

 crinus, Bronn, 1860. Die Klass. Ord. Thier-Reichs bd. 2, 

 Aktinozoen taf. 23. — Nucleocrinus, Dana, 1863. Man. Geol., 

 p. 274, fig. 452.— U. H— Falls of Ohio, near Columbus, Oh. 



ELEUTHEROCRINUS, Shumard & Yandell, 1856. Proc. Ac. Nat. 



Sci. Phil., vol. viii., p. 73. 

 Cassedayi, Shumard & Yandell, 1856. Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil., 



vol. viii., p. 74, pi. 2.— Bronn, 1860. Die Klass. Ord. d. 



Thier-Reichs, bd. 2, Aktinozoen taf. 23, fig. 7.— U. H— 



Bear Grass Creek, near Louisville, Kentucky. 

 Whitfieldi, Hall, 1862. 15th Rep. Reg. State Cab. New York, p. 



151. — Ham. — Western New York. 



ENCRINA, v. Pentremites. 



ERETMOCRINUS,t Lyon & Casseday, 1859. Amer. Jour. Sci., n. 

 ser., vol. 28, p. 24. (Subgenus of Actinocrinus.) 

 magnificus, Lyon & Casseday, 1859. Amer. Jour. Sci., vol. 28, p. 

 241. (Compare Actinocrinus remibrachiatus, Hall.) 



ERISOCRINUS, Meek & Worthen, March, 1865. Amer. Jour. Sci., 



n. ser., vol. 39, p. 174. — Philocrinus, id. ibid, May, 1865. 



(Not Koninck, 1863.) — Erisocrinus, id. ibid, Aug., 1865, 



p. 149. 



conoidous, Meek & Worthen, Aug., 1865. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. 



■ Phil., p. ,150.— U. C. M.— Springfield, Illinois. 



t This Subgenus is very closely related to Actinocrinus, the essential 

 points of structure being precisely the same in both. The peculiarities in 

 form and arrangemsntof the arms mentioned by Lyon and Casseday seem 

 to me to be of merely specific value. 



