I08 DISCUSSION 



BiLLiNGHAM, R. E., and Sparrow, E. M. (1954). J. exp. Biol., 31, 16. 



Cohen, S. N. (1961). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. {N.Y.), 106, 677. 



Craigmyle, M. B. L. (1958). J. Anat. [Loud.), 92, 467. 



Craigmyle, M. B. L. (i960). Transplant. Bnll, 26, 150. 



Gibson, T., Davis, W. B., and Curran, R. C. (1958). Brit. J. plast. Surg., 11, 



177. 

 Lemon, H. M., Lutz, B. R., Pope, R., Parsons, L., Handler, A. H., and Patt, 



D. I. (1952). Science, us i a6i. 

 Litchfield, J. T. (1949). ]. Pharmacol, exp. Ther., 97, 399. 

 Maumenee, a. E. (195 i). Amer.J. OphthaL, 34, 142. 

 McGregor, L A., and Conway, H. (1956). Transplatit. Bull., 3, 46. 

 McKhann, C. F., and Berrian, J. H. (1959). Ann. Surg., 150, 1025. 

 Medawar, p. B. (1944). J. Anat. (Lond.), 78, 176. 

 Medawar, p. B. (1948). Brit. J. exp. Path., 29, 58. 

 Merwin, R. M., and Hill, E. L. (1954). J. nat. Cancer Inst., 14, 819. 

 MiTCHisoN, N. A. (1954). Proc. roy. Soc. B., 142, 72. 

 Priddy, R. B., and Brodie, A. F. (1948). J. Morph., 83, 149. 

 Russell, P. S. (1961). In Transplantation of Tissues and Cells, p. 35, eds, 



Billingham, R. E. and Silvers, W. K. Philadelphia: Wistar Institute Press. 

 ScoTHORNE, R.J. (1956). J. Anat. (Lond.), 90, 417. 

 Scothorne, R.J. (1958). Arm. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 73, 673. 

 Shepro, D., Eidelhoch, L. P., and Patt, D. L (i960). Anat. Rec, 136, 393. 

 TooLAN, H. W. (1958). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 73, 546. 

 Weaver, J. M., Algire, G. H., and Prehn, R. T. (1955). J. nat. Cancer Inst., 



15, 1737- 



Woodruff, M. F. A. (1957). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 64, 1014. 



Woodruff, M. F. A. (1959). In Biological Problems of Grafting, p. 83, eds. 



Albert, F. and Medawar, P. B. Oxford: Blackwell. 

 Woodruff, M. F. A., and Woodruff, H. G. (1950). Phil. Trans. B., 234, 559. 

 YoHN, D. S., Hammon, W. M., Atchison, R. W., and Castro, B. C. (1962). 



Cancer Res., in press. 



DISCUSSION 



Woodruff: We (Woodruff, M. F. A. and Woodruff, H. G. [1950]. 

 Phil. Trans. B. 234, 559) were interested some years ago in analysing 

 the curious properties of another privileged site, the anterior chamber 

 of the eye, and they differ very sharply from those of the hamster 

 cheek pouch. A graft in the anterior chamber w^ill not take in a pre- 

 sensitized animal. We were inclined to jump to the same conclusion 

 that you have properly drawn — but it didn't apply in our case because 

 we showed subsequently that a graft in the anterior chamber will sen- 



