CENT. VI. 83 
565, Cotinas ellipticus Raf. ramis striatis, 
petiolis brevis marginatis, fol. ellipt. utrinque ob- 
tusis, panieulis non plumosis.—Mts. of Tyrol, 
Carniolia, Sibiria and Origon? leaves larger 
than in others often triuncial, panicle of many 
large flowers, seldom plumose. : 
566, Sumacus copallina Raf. Rhus do O. 
well known sp. to which Torrey has mixt 2 
new ones, S. montana and floridana. This 
has twigs verrucose, few entire leaflets acumi- 
nate &c &c—New Jersey Kc. 
567, Sumacus montana Raf. differs by fo- 
lioles unequaly serrate &c—Allegh. Mts.—The 
- bad name of Rhus must be discarded, and we 
shall have instead Cotinus, Sumacus, Philoste- 
mon, Lobadium, Thezera, Metopium, Cominia, 
Festania, Malosma and Lilithia Raf. (10 sta- 
mens) all good genera, see my revision. 
PHILOSTEMON Raf. ff. lud. p. 107, dif- 
fers from Sumacus by flowers dioical, calix ur- 
ceolate 5dent. petals reflexed, stigma one, fruit 
umbilieate (in all?) leaves ternate, 2 folioles 
sessile obliqual middle petiolate, fl. racemose 
not paniculate. 
568, Philostemon toxicodendron R. Rhus 
do. L. O. frutescens pubens, ramulis teretis 
punctatis, foliolis ovatis obovatisque, subangula- 
tis, acutis, petiolis longissimis striatis, drupis 
globosis glabris fuscatis—N. Amer. Torrey has 
blended 3 or 4 species with it as usual. 
569, Philast. radicans R. Rhus do L. O. 
sepe scandens radicans glabrum, ramnlis stria- 
tis, petiolis longis semiteres, foliolis ovatis acu- 
minatis integris, drupis glabris fuscatis—now 
properly distinguished from last. : 
570, Philost. lutescens Raf. an Ph. radicans 
fl. lud. 354? scandens, ramis angulatis verruco- 
