SEPTEMBER 6, 1900. 



The Weekly Florists' Review* 



437 



THEY LIKE THE REVIEW. 



We couldn't do without the Review. 

 Macomb. III. F. E. BONHAM. 



I like the Review. Enclosed please find 

 subscription for this year. 

 Warwick, R. I. FRED. C. GREEN. 



We could not think of doing without the 

 Review. W. H. GULP & CO. 



Wichita, Kans. 



You have made a splendid paper of The 

 Review. JAMES MORTON. 



Clarksville, Tenn. 



I would not be without The Review at any 

 price. C. F. W. GENTEMANN. 



Qulncy. 111. 



Am always pleased with with The Review. 

 Lehighton, Pa. PAUL, NIEHOFF. 



Am always pleased with the paper. The 

 classified advs. are a great convenience. 



H. M. SBALT. 

 Lyndbrook. N. T. 



The Review is O. K. We especially like the 

 alphabetical advs., which is a very handy 

 thing for a busy florist. H. D. CALDWELL 



Paris, III. 



The Review is up-to-date. R. MBARNS. 

 Toronto, Ont. 



The Florists' Review is a good, number one 

 paper, and we wish you the success you cer- 

 tainly deserve. J. n. WADE & CO. 



Evansville, Ind. 



The classified plant advertisements In your 

 paper are well worth the price of the sub- 

 scription, for one has not got to hunt the 

 paper through to find just what he wants. 

 Then one has that extra time saved to read 

 the good things in the first half of the paper. 

 I wish you the best of success tor the coming 

 year. M. S. WORDEN 



North Adams, Mass. 



The paper has been In many Instances a 

 great help to us In our business and we would 

 not be without It. We wish you abundant 

 success. BOEHRINGER BROS. 



Bay City, Mich. 



I am very much pleased with The Review, 

 and I wish you every success with it. 



FRED C. WEBER. 

 St. Louis, Mo. 



I could not get along without the paper, as 

 it contains so much valuable advice and hints. 

 GEO. DOBBS. 

 Auburn, N. T. 



I think The Review Is keeping its place well 

 In front. And it has my sympathy, as any 

 other would have that breaks away from 

 monopolists' lines. JOHN B. FERGUSON. 



Pittsburg, Pa. 



Enclosed find one dollar to renew my sub- 

 scription to The Florists' Review, the best 

 of the trade papers. JAMES COX. 



Bridgeport, O. 



I cannot keep house without it. 



F. W. FELTEN. 

 Swope, Mo. 



I think your paper the best connected with 

 the trade, and would not do without It. 



W. SCOTT. 

 St. Paul, Minn. 



I am extremely well pleased with The Re- 

 view. The make-up of each issue Is as near 

 perfect as can be. The classified ads have been 

 a great help to me (and to many others, I 

 presume) in buying stock. N. H. PADGETTT. 



Unadilla, N. T. 



I wish The Review the fullest success, which 

 it so thoroughly deserves. JESSE ROBBINS. 

 Carlisle, Pa. 



■ May you prosper in the future as in the 

 past, and may all of us live many years to 

 Review it. F. J. FILLMORE. 



St. Louis. Mo. 



I ^have been well pleased with your paper. 



HENRY ELBERS. 

 Buffalo, N. Y. 



Am well pleased with The Review and find 

 it a great help in many way.-!. 



FRBB'K A. TAYLOtt. 

 Canaslota, N. T. 



My best wishes are with The Review. 



ARCHIBALD DESPEAUX. 

 Milwaukee, Wis. 



Your paper is the best of the three. The 

 classified plant advs. are awfully handy 

 and are alone worth the price of subscription. 

 GUST. B. STEINHAUSER. 



Philadelphia. 



The best paper for the trade. 



JOHN J. KELLEY. 

 Valley Falls, R. I. 



I am so well pleased with The Review that 

 I feel we cannot get along without it. I wish 

 you the best of success, which you thoroughly 

 deserve. JAS. GELVEN. 



Sedalia, Mo. 



The Review is ALL RIGHT. 



WM. J. WERT. 

 Parsons, Kan. 



Would be sorry not to get The Review, as 

 it is a great help to anyone in our line, and 

 many of the articles are worth mora than the 

 subscription. WM. PENNEY. 



Quebec, 



I would as soon think of getting along with- 

 out The Review as I would of getting along 

 without a boiler to heat my greenhouses. I 

 read it with a great deal of pleasure and 

 profit. T. D. BROWN. 



Adams, Mass. 



Your paper !s all right, and is always a 

 welcome visitor to our table. 



BEACH & CHESSMAN. 

 Richmond, Ind. 



I find your paper a great advantage to me in 

 a business way. H. D. TURNBULL. 



Carbondale, Pa. 



I consider The Review indispensable in my 

 business. Simply could not do without it. 

 W. C. SCOVELL 

 Malta, O. 



I am much pleased with the Review. 



EVELYN B. TAYLOR. 

 MUford, Mass. 



The Review is all right. 



Terre Haute, Ind. 



L. HEINL. 



We think a whole lot of the Review. 

 Wichita, Kans. W. J. GULP. 



Let me say that the Review is more valuable 

 than any I know of. Long live the Review 1 

 Parsons, Kans. WM. J. WIRT. 



The Review is a great help and is perfectly sat- 

 isfactory. I will never be without it. 

 Chicago. PETER GESCHEIDLE, 



Enclosed find $1.00 to renew my subscription to 

 THE BEST of the florists' trade papers. 

 Plymouth, O. FANNIE E. CASE. 



I could not get along without the Review. 

 Halifax, N. S. AGNES TAIT. 



I am very well pleased with the Review. 

 Lisbon, O. JOHN M. H.\NDTB. 



I find lots of valuable information in the 

 Review. E. HOLMES. 



Dorchester, Mass. 



Like it? We could not keep house without 

 it. SAN ANGELO GREENHOUSES. 



San Angelo, Tex. 



The Review is all right! 



Denver. Colo. THOS. CHAPMAN. 



We are very much pleased with the 

 Florists' Review. 

 Owatonna, Minn. Lord & Johnson. 



Your paper needs no recommendation. 

 It speaks for itself. 

 Chester, Pa. Herbert Shaw. 



I wish you success with the Review. It 

 is the best trade paper we have got. 

 Rhinebeck, N. T. C. Lawritzen. 



It is a good paper. 

 Wheeling, W. Va. 



E. O'Neil. 



Our year of weekly visits was both 

 pleasing and instructive. Keep it up and 

 you cannot help but profit. 



Meriden, Conn. A. L. Hall 



The 69th fair of the American Institute will be 

 held in the Berkeley Lyceum Building, New Vork 

 City. September 25 to 27. The department of 

 flowers and plants will be in charge of James W. 

 Withers. Copies of the premium list may be had 

 by addressing Dr. F. M. Hexamer," .52 Lafayette 

 Place, New York. 



Tif( 



"y 



WILLIAM Scott 



Is a book of 224 large pages (same size as those 

 of the Florists' Review t, and contains about 200 ar- 

 ticles on commercial plants and cultural operations, 

 each giving " the meat" only, from the personal ex- 

 perience of a thoroughly practical man who is in 

 daily touch with each department of the business 

 and who has that rare quality of being able to tell 

 others what they want to know. The articles 

 are arranged alphabetically, hke those in an ency- 

 clopaedia, and in an instant one can turn to the sub- 

 ject upon which Hght is desired at the moment. The 

 book is illustrated by over 200 fine half-tone engrav- 

 ings. It is 



A Complete Reference Book for 

 Commercial Florists 



and is a whole library on practical commercial flori- 

 culture in one volume. It is very handsomely and 

 substantially bound in half leather, with specially 

 ' " ' -itlei 



designed title in gold. 

 Price, 95.00 Carriagfe Prepaid. 



Florists' Publishing Co., ^*'bTiding. Chicago. 



HITCHINGS & CO. 



233 MERCER ST., NEW YORK. 



GREENHOISE BOILERS 



PIPES, nniNGS A\D VINTIUTIVG APPXRMI S 



Send Four Cents for Catalogue. • ■ . GRCtMIOl St HI l|.l)IN(i 



M.-nll.Mi ■[■li. 



whpn y"U wrl'f 



