8 



Khynchcenus proboscideus, I am still inclined to think is 

 the prohoscideus of Fabricius, as the length of the proboscis and 

 the color of the body vary in every specimen which I have 

 observed. The proboscis of one was at least longer than the 

 body; but that method of giving the measure of insects I 

 find very incorrect in most authors, and liable to deceive 

 the student. 



Peleeinus polyeerator is common among us. I have usually 

 found it on the oak trees, flying slowly, and easily caught ; 

 its turns its abdomen like a wasp, or an ichneumon, appar- 

 ently striving to sting the hand that holds it. Midas filata is 

 not very rare, but caught with difficulty. 



HENTZ TO HAKRIS. 



Northampton, Jan. 1, 1826. 



I have taken pains to dissect two specimens of Chremas- 

 tocheilus; this is the result. The different parts of the mouth 

 do not materially differ in shape ; but in the smallest spe- 

 cies, C. castaneus^ I could not see any trace of the labium 

 (upper lip), whilst in C. piger that part is quite large. 

 Thinldno; that I mio;ht have lost or left unobserved the labium 

 in the first dissection, I took another insect of the same species, 

 the last but one in my cabinet, and became convinced that that 

 part was certainly wanting in C. castancus. I sent a draw- 

 ing of both species to Mv. Say, Avith descriptions, more than 

 three months ago, and thought my letter might not have 

 reached him ; but some days ago I received an obliging answer 

 to my various questions. He thinks both species are new, as 

 both differ from the description of C. castaneus ; that I can- 

 not decide, for all the knowledge I have of that species is de- 

 rived from a very short description by Latreille (in the Hist, 

 des Crust, et des Ins.) which describes it as being tout noir^ 

 and refers to Knoch, but I have not the work of that naturalist. 



