PUPILLA. 85 



1. Angular, parietal, columellar, palatal. 



2. Angular, parietal, columellar, palatal. 



3. Angular, parietal, columellar, palatal. 



4. Angular, columellar, palatal. 



5. Angular, parietal, columellar, 



6. Angular, parietal, columellar, 



7. Angular, parietal, columellar, 



8. Angular, parietal, palatal. 



9. Angular, parietal, 



10. Angular, 



PuPiLLA cuPA (Jan). Vol. 26, p. 185. 



The type of Vertigo eumicra Bourguiguat (Vol. 26, p. 233) 

 from near Lucerne, is stated by G. Mermod (Revue Suisse de 

 Zool. Vol. 33, July, 1926, p. 568) to be a specimen of PupiUa 

 sterri Voith {=cupa). Vertigo eumicra Clessin is considered 

 by Mermod to be a toothless V. arctica Wallenb. 



On page 188 of Vol. 26 the first two paragraphs should 

 follow the account of P. cupa turcmenia. They were accident- 

 ally transposed. 



PUPILLA TRIPLICATA (Stud.). Vol. 26, p. 189. 



Rosen (Mittheil. Kaukasischen Museums VI, 1914, p. 192, 

 193) gives Caucasus localities for var. luxurians Reinh, ; var. 

 inops Reinh. {cylindrata Bttg.), which was placed under 

 muscorum in Manual Vol. 26, p. 180, following Boettger, prob- 

 ably a mistake ; and var. s^iiconiformis Bttg., the latter a pen 

 or typographical error for suhoviformis Bttg., Jahrb. D. M. 

 Ges. VI, 1879, p. 26 ; Manual Vol. 26, p. 192 (where Vol. VII 

 of the Jahrbiicher is erroneously cited). 



PUPILLA SIGNATA (MOUSS.). Vol. 26, p. 194. 



This species has been reported from Alaska by Westerlund 

 (Vega-Exped. Vetenskap. lakttagelser, IV, 1887, p. 164) and 

 from the Rocky Mountains by Sterki (Nautilus VI, 1892, p. 

 3) but both records seem to have been based upon erroneous 

 identifications. 



Pupa diecki Gredler (Vol. 26, p. 196) is thought by Lind- 

 holm to be identical with signata (Ann. Mus. Zool. Acad. Sci. 

 Russ., 1922, p. 309).- 



