﻿PELECYPODA 
  

  

  69 
  

  

  Number 
  (3) 
  is 
  probably 
  the 
  specimen 
  listed 
  by 
  Carpenter 
  in 
  the 
  original 
  description 
  

   ("also 
  fossil"). 
  If 
  this 
  specimen 
  were 
  not 
  the 
  fossil 
  and 
  in 
  this 
  case 
  the 
  supplementary 
  mater- 
  

   ial, 
  it 
  would 
  be 
  the 
  logical 
  specimen 
  for 
  the 
  neotype. 
  It 
  seems 
  better 
  to 
  select 
  a 
  Recent 
  speci- 
  

   men 
  for 
  that 
  category. 
  In 
  choosing 
  a 
  neotype 
  from 
  this 
  material, 
  one 
  must 
  balance 
  the 
  rela- 
  

   tive 
  merits 
  of 
  suites 
  (1) 
  and 
  (2). 
  Specimens 
  of 
  (1) 
  are 
  topotypes 
  but 
  not 
  by 
  the 
  original 
  

   collector 
  (Cassidy, 
  Cooper), 
  whereas 
  specimens 
  from 
  (2) 
  are 
  by 
  the 
  original 
  collector 
  but 
  

   not 
  from 
  the 
  type 
  locality. 
  The 
  Redpath 
  Museum 
  Collection 
  is 
  so 
  far 
  the 
  only 
  one 
  which 
  has 
  

   yielded 
  specimens 
  identified 
  by 
  Carpenter. 
  The 
  U. 
  S. 
  National 
  Museum 
  does 
  not 
  contain 
  

   specimens 
  of 
  the 
  forma 
  collected 
  by 
  Cassidy, 
  Cooper, 
  or 
  Blake 
  (H. 
  A. 
  Rehder, 
  May 
  29, 
  1950, 
  

   personal 
  communication). 
  

  

  Type. 
  — 
  Not 
  found 
  

  

  Type 
  locality. 
  — 
  San 
  Diego, 
  California 
  

  

  Family 
  Pectinidae 
  

  

  Genus 
  Pecten'^s 
  Miiller 
  1776 
  

  

  Pccten 
  MiJLLER, 
  1776, 
  Zoologiae 
  Danicae 
  Prodromus, 
  p. 
  XXXI, 
  248 
  

  

  Type 
  species 
  by 
  subsequent 
  designation, 
  Schmidt, 
  1818, 
  Versuch. 
  Conch-Samml., 
  p. 
  67, 
  Os- 
  

  

  trea 
  maxima 
  Lixxaeus, 
  1758, 
  Syst. 
  Nat., 
  10th 
  ed., 
  p. 
  696. 
  Recent. 
  Northern 
  Europe. 
  

  

  Reeve, 
  1852, 
  Conch. 
  Icon., 
  vol. 
  8. 
  Pecten, 
  pi. 
  IX, 
  fig. 
  38 
  

  

  Subgenus 
  Chlamys 
  Reeding 
  in 
  Bolten, 
  1798 
  

  

  Chlamys 
  Roedixg 
  in 
  Bolten, 
  1798, 
  Mus. 
  Boltenianum, 
  pars 
  2, 
  p. 
  161 
  

  

  Type 
  species 
  by 
  subsequent 
  designation, 
  Herrmannsex, 
  1846, 
  Indicis 
  Gen. 
  Malacozoorum, 
  

  

  vol. 
  1, 
  p. 
  231, 
  Pccten 
  islandiciis 
  (Linnaeus) 
  = 
  Ostrea 
  islandicus 
  Gmelix, 
  1791, 
  Syst. 
  Nat., 
  

  

  13 
  ed., 
  p. 
  3326 
  = 
  Pccten 
  islandicus 
  Muller, 
  1776, 
  Zool. 
  Danicae 
  Prod., 
  p. 
  248. 
  Living. 
  

  

  Circumboreal. 
  Greenland 
  to 
  Cape 
  Cod. 
  Arctic 
  to 
  Puget 
  Sound. 
  Abbott, 
  American 
  Sea 
  

  

  Shells, 
  p. 
  365. 
  pi. 
  27, 
  fig. 
  L 
  

  

  Pecten 
  (Chlamys) 
  rubidus 
  Hinds 
  

  

  (PI. 
  3, 
  figs. 
  4-6) 
  

   Pecten 
  rubidus 
  Hixds, 
  1844, 
  Zool. 
  Voy. 
  Sulphur, 
  Moll., 
  p. 
  61, 
  pi. 
  17, 
  fig. 
  5; 
  Reeve, 
  1853, 
  

  

  Conch. 
  Icon., 
  vol. 
  8, 
  Pecten, 
  pi. 
  XXIII, 
  fig. 
  90. 
  Not 
  P. 
  rubidus 
  Martyx, 
  1784, 
  Universal 
  

  

  Couchologist 
  

   Pecten 
  Fabricii 
  Gould 
  not 
  Philippi, 
  Carpexter, 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  574; 
  Reprint, 
  1872, 
  p. 
  60 
  

   Pectai 
  Hindsii 
  Carpexter, 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  574, 
  606, 
  645 
  ; 
  Reprint, 
  1872, 
  p. 
  60, 
  92, 
  131 
  ; 
  1865, 
  Acad. 
  

  

  Nat. 
  Sci. 
  Philadelphia, 
  Proc, 
  vol. 
  17, 
  p. 
  58, 
  ? 
  var. 
  

   Pecten 
  hastatus 
  var. 
  Hindsii 
  Carpenter, 
  Cooper, 
  1867, 
  Geog. 
  Cat. 
  Moll., 
  Geol. 
  Sur. 
  California, 
  

  

  p. 
  12 
  _ 
  

   Pecten 
  hericeus 
  var. 
  hindsii 
  Carpenter, 
  Whiteaves, 
  1887, 
  Roy. 
  Soc. 
  Canada, 
  Trans., 
  vol. 
  4, 
  

  

  sec. 
  4, 
  p. 
  119; 
  D.\ll, 
  1898, 
  Wagner 
  Free 
  Inst. 
  Sci. 
  Philadelphia, 
  Trans., 
  vol. 
  Ill, 
  pt. 
  IV, 
  

  

  p. 
  709 
  

   Pecten 
  hericeus 
  var. 
  navarchus 
  Dale, 
  1898, 
  Wagner 
  Free 
  Inst. 
  Sci. 
  Philadelphia, 
  Trans., 
  vol. 
  

  

  Ill, 
  pt. 
  IV, 
  p. 
  708, 
  new 
  name 
  for 
  P. 
  rubidus 
  Hinds, 
  1844 
  

   Pecten 
  (Chlamys) 
  hastatus 
  Sowerby 
  var. 
  Hindsii 
  Carpenter, 
  Arxold, 
  1906, 
  U. 
  S. 
  Nat. 
  Mus., 
  

  

  Prof. 
  Paper, 
  no. 
  47, 
  p. 
  Ill, 
  pi. 
  XLIII, 
  figs. 
  1, 
  2, 
  2a 
  

   Not 
  ? 
  Pecten 
  (Chlamys) 
  Hiiidsii 
  Carpenter, 
  Dautzexberg 
  axd 
  Bavary, 
  1912, 
  Siboga 
  

  

  Exped., 
  Les 
  Lamellibranches, 
  LI 
  II 
  b, 
  p. 
  12 
  

   Pecten 
  (Chla)nys) 
  /lindsii 
  Carpenter, 
  Dall, 
  1914, 
  Nautilus, 
  vol. 
  27, 
  no. 
  11, 
  p. 
  122; 
  1921, 
  p. 
  

  

  709 
  in 
  part; 
  Oi.droyd, 
  1924, 
  Pub. 
  Puget 
  Sound 
  Biol. 
  Station, 
  vol. 
  4, 
  p. 
  17, 
  pi. 
  23, 
  figs. 
  3, 
  

  

  4; 
  Oldkoyd, 
  1924b, 
  p. 
  53, 
  pi. 
  7, 
  figs. 
  3, 
  4; 
  Burch, 
  1944, 
  no. 
  35, 
  p. 
  6; 
  Burch, 
  1945, 
  no. 
  45, 
  

  

  p. 
  6 
  

  

  "Pecten 
  rubidus 
  Hinds," 
  Keep, 
  1911, 
  W^est 
  Coast 
  Shells, 
  p. 
  41 
  

  

  Pecten 
  islandicus 
  Miiller 
  variety 
  hindsii 
  Carpenter, 
  Graxt 
  axd 
  Gale, 
  1931, 
  p. 
  163 
  in 
  part; 
  

   Woodrixg, 
  Bramlette, 
  axd 
  Kew, 
  1946, 
  U. 
  S. 
  Geol. 
  Sur., 
  Prof. 
  Paper 
  207, 
  p. 
  80 
  

  

  Pecten 
  hindsii 
  navarchus 
  Dall, 
  Baily, 
  1935, 
  West 
  Coast 
  Shells 
  (Keep), 
  p. 
  52 
  

   ". 
  . 
  . 
  Non 
  P. 
  Fabricii 
  Gld. 
  = 
  P. 
  Hindsii, 
  jun." 
  [Carpenter 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  574] 
  

   "'Pecten 
  rubidus, 
  Hds.' 
  Vane. 
  Is., 
  Lyall. 
  [Hind's 
  type 
  in 
  Br. 
  Mus. 
  appears 
  to 
  be 
  the 
  

  

  ordinary 
  form, 
  of 
  which 
  P. 
  hastatus 
  = 
  hericeus 
  is 
  the 
  highly 
  sculptured 
  var. 
  This 
  shell, 
  

  

  which 
  is 
  more 
  allied 
  to 
  Islandicus, 
  may 
  stand 
  as 
  P. 
  Hindsii.]" 
  [Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  606] 
  

  

  i^For 
  information 
  on 
  the 
  Pecten 
  Osbeck 
  problem, 
  see 
  Tomlin 
  (in 
  Burch, 
  1944, 
  p. 
  3) 
  

  

  