﻿GASTROPODA 
  

  

  125 
  

  

  Acmaea 
  rosacea 
  Carpenter 
  

  

  Acmaca 
  (? 
  pilcolus, 
  var.) 
  rosacea 
  Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  614, 
  650, 
  Reprint, 
  1872, 
  p. 
  100, 
  136; 
  

   1866a, 
  Feb., 
  California 
  Acad. 
  Sci., 
  Proc, 
  vol. 
  Ill, 
  p. 
  213; 
  1866c, 
  Oct., 
  Amer. 
  Jour. 
  Conch., 
  

   vol. 
  II, 
  p. 
  341 
  ; 
  Cooper, 
  1867, 
  Geog. 
  Cat. 
  Moll., 
  Geol. 
  Sur. 
  California, 
  p. 
  23 
  

  

  Acmaea 
  rosacea 
  Carpenter, 
  Cooper, 
  1870, 
  Amer. 
  Jour. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  VI, 
  p. 
  60; 
  Keep, 
  1887, 
  

   West 
  Coast 
  Shells, 
  p. 
  100; 
  Pilshry, 
  1891, 
  Alan. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  XIII, 
  p. 
  21, 
  pi. 
  7, 
  figs. 
  71, 
  72, 
  

   7i 
  type; 
  Dall, 
  1921, 
  p. 
  170; 
  Kelsey, 
  1922, 
  Nautilus, 
  vol. 
  36, 
  no. 
  1, 
  p. 
  18; 
  Oldroyd, 
  1924, 
  

   Pub. 
  Puget 
  Sound 
  Biol. 
  Station, 
  vol. 
  4, 
  p. 
  168; 
  1927, 
  vol. 
  II, 
  pt. 
  Ill, 
  p. 
  156; 
  Baily, 
  West 
  

   Coast 
  Shells 
  (Keep), 
  p. 
  175; 
  Keen, 
  1937, 
  p. 
  28; 
  Burch, 
  1946, 
  no. 
  56, 
  p. 
  35; 
  no. 
  57, 
  p. 
  

   5, 
  14 
  subgenus?; 
  Test. 
  1946, 
  Cont. 
  Univ. 
  Mich. 
  Lab. 
  Vert. 
  Biol., 
  no. 
  31, 
  p. 
  1; 
  Smith 
  

   AND 
  Gordon, 
  1948, 
  California 
  Acad. 
  Sci., 
  Proc, 
  ser. 
  4, 
  vol. 
  XXVI, 
  p. 
  200 
  

  

  CoUiscUa 
  (?) 
  rosacea 
  Dall, 
  1871. 
  Amer. 
  Jour. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  VI, 
  p. 
  256 
  

  

  " 
  — 
  Monterey 
  to 
  San 
  Diego. 
  This 
  shell 
  is 
  named 
  pilcolus 
  Midd., 
  in 
  Mus. 
  Cuming, 
  but 
  

  

  does 
  not 
  agree 
  with 
  the 
  diagnoses. 
  It 
  can 
  hardly 
  be 
  distinguished 
  from 
  Herm 
  specimens 
  of 
  

  

  A. 
  virginea. 
  It 
  was 
  first 
  brought 
  by 
  Col. 
  Jewett, 
  but 
  referred 
  to 
  Panama." 
  [Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  

  

  p. 
  614j 
  

  

  "Pink, 
  small: 
  like 
  Herm 
  specimens 
  of 
  virginea." 
  [Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  650] 
  

  

  The 
  following 
  lines 
  should 
  be 
  added 
  to 
  Carpenter's 
  description 
  (1866) 
  as 
  published 
  by 
  

  

  Oldroyd 
  (1927), 
  to 
  make 
  that 
  copy 
  complete 
  : 
  

   Delete 
  "poll."52 
  and 
  add 
  : 
  

  

  "— 
  div. 
  100°. 
  

  

  "Hab. 
  San 
  Diego, 
  1 
  sp. 
  jun. 
  (Palmer) 
  : 
  Monterey, 
  1 
  dead 
  sp. 
  Cooper. 
  

  

  "The 
  absence 
  of 
  striae, 
  very 
  thin 
  texture, 
  and 
  regularly 
  conical 
  growth, 
  distinguish 
  this 
  

   shell 
  from 
  A. 
  patina, 
  a 
  rare 
  variety 
  of 
  which 
  has 
  a 
  pinkish 
  tinge. 
  Specimens 
  in 
  Mus. 
  Cuming 
  

   are 
  marked 
  'pUeolus. 
  Midd..' 
  but 
  do 
  not 
  accord 
  with 
  the 
  diagnosis. 
  It 
  is 
  almost 
  exactly 
  like 
  

   Herm* 
  specimens 
  of 
  A. 
  virginea. 
  Col. 
  Jewett's 
  similar 
  shells, 
  marked 
  "Panama" 
  were 
  per- 
  

   haps 
  West 
  Indian." 
  [Carpenter, 
  1866a, 
  p. 
  213] 
  

   '^ 
  "A 
  small 
  island 
  in 
  the 
  British 
  channel." 
  

  

  Carpenter 
  repeated 
  (1866c, 
  Oct.) 
  his 
  description 
  (1866a, 
  Feb.) 
  and 
  presented 
  in 
  detail 
  the 
  

   description 
  of 
  A. 
  pilcolus 
  Middendorf. 
  

  

  Pilsbry 
  described 
  the 
  species 
  and 
  figured 
  the 
  holotype. 
  Dall 
  gave 
  a 
  detailed 
  description 
  

   based 
  on 
  the 
  holotype. 
  The 
  holotype 
  has 
  a 
  label 
  "San 
  Pedro, 
  Dr. 
  Palmer." 
  

  

  Dimensions. 
  — 
  Holotype. 
  5 
  mm. 
  length 
  ; 
  4 
  mm. 
  width 
  ; 
  2 
  mm. 
  height. 
  

  

  Holotype. 
  — 
  U. 
  S. 
  National 
  Museum, 
  no. 
  15273 
  

  

  Distribution. 
  — 
  Recent. 
  San 
  Pedro, 
  California 
  (type) 
  ; 
  Ketchikan, 
  Alaska, 
  south 
  to 
  Panama 
  

   (Burch). 
  Pleistocene. 
  Mexico. 
  (Hertlein, 
  1934) 
  

  

  Acmaea 
  strigatella 
  Carpenter 
  

   Acmaea 
  striqatclla 
  Carpenter, 
  1864, 
  June, 
  .Ann. 
  Mag. 
  Nat. 
  Hist., 
  ser. 
  3, 
  vol. 
  XIII. 
  p. 
  474; 
  

  

  Reprint. 
  1872, 
  p. 
  214; 
  1864b, 
  Aug.. 
  Suppl. 
  Rept. 
  British 
  Assoc. 
  1863, 
  p. 
  666; 
  Reprint, 
  1872, 
  

  

  p. 
  152; 
  1865, 
  Zool. 
  Soc. 
  London. 
  Proc., 
  p. 
  277, 
  Reprint, 
  1872, 
  p. 
  268; 
  Pilsbry, 
  1891, 
  Man. 
  

  

  Conch., 
  vol. 
  XIII, 
  p. 
  27, 
  pi. 
  7. 
  figs. 
  83, 
  84, 
  85 
  type; 
  Pilsbry 
  and 
  Lowe, 
  1932, 
  Acad. 
  Nat. 
  

  

  Sci., 
  Philadelphia, 
  Proc, 
  vol. 
  LXXXIV, 
  p. 
  129 
  

   Acmaca 
  strigillata 
  Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  618; 
  Reprint, 
  1872, 
  p. 
  104 
  typographical 
  error 
  for 
  

  

  A. 
  strigatella 
  

   Collisella 
  strigatella 
  (Carpenter), 
  Dall, 
  1871, 
  Amer. 
  Jour. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  VI, 
  p. 
  253, 
  ? 
  pi. 
  14, 
  

  

  fig. 
  5 
  

   Acmaca 
  persona 
  strigillata 
  Carpenter, 
  Dall, 
  1921, 
  p. 
  170 
  in 
  part; 
  Oldroyd, 
  1927, 
  vol. 
  II, 
  pt. 
  

  

  Ill, 
  p. 
  155 
  

   Not 
  Acmaea 
  patina 
  strigillata 
  (= 
  A. 
  strigillata 
  Nutt.,) 
  Carpenter, 
  1866, 
  Amer. 
  Jour. 
  Conch., 
  

  

  vol. 
  II, 
  p. 
  334, 
  337 
  

   Acmaea 
  (Patclloidea) 
  persona 
  strigatella 
  Carpenter, 
  Burch, 
  1946, 
  no. 
  57. 
  p. 
  10 
  

   Acmaea 
  persona 
  ? 
  strigatella 
  Carpenter, 
  Smith 
  and 
  Gordon, 
  1948, 
  California 
  Acad. 
  Sci., 
  

  

  Proc, 
  ser. 
  4, 
  vol. 
  XXVI, 
  p. 
  200 
  

  

  The 
  following 
  corrections 
  and 
  lines 
  should 
  be 
  added 
  to 
  the 
  copy 
  of 
  the 
  original 
  description 
  

   as 
  published 
  by 
  Oldroyd 
  to 
  make 
  the 
  copy 
  complete 
  : 
  

  

  Read 
  .9 
  for 
  9 
  ; 
  .74 
  for 
  74; 
  .3 
  for 
  "3." 
  

  

  "Variat 
  colore 
  hie 
  et 
  illic 
  aurantiaco 
  tincto 
  : 
  strigis 
  omnino 
  tessellatis. 
  

  

  ^-Carpenter 
  (1866, 
  Oct., 
  p. 
  341) 
  gave 
  the 
  same 
  measurements 
  in 
  "poll;"' 
  in 
  this 
  case 
  the 
  

   "poll" 
  would 
  be 
  admissable. 
  

  

  