﻿GASTROPODA 
  

  

  139 
  

  

  Distribution.— 
  Rtcmt. 
  Catalina 
  Island, 
  California 
  (type). 
  Forrester 
  Island, 
  Alaska, 
  to 
  

   San 
  Diego, 
  California, 
  and 
  the 
  Coronado 
  Islands, 
  California, 
  also 
  Japan 
  (Dall).56 
  Pleistocene 
  

   (Arnold). 
  Pliocene 
  (Waterfall, 
  1929) 
  

  

  Genus 
  Calliostoma 
  Swainson, 
  1840 
  

  

  Calliostoma 
  Swainsox, 
  1840, 
  Treatise 
  on 
  Malacology, 
  p. 
  218, 
  351 
  

  

  Type 
  species 
  by 
  subsequent 
  designation, 
  Hermannsen, 
  1846, 
  Indicis 
  Gcnerum 
  Malacozoorum, 
  

  

  vol. 
  1, 
  p. 
  154, 
  Trochus 
  comtlus 
  Lixnaeus. 
  1758, 
  Syst. 
  Nat. 
  X, 
  p. 
  759; 
  XII, 
  1767, 
  p. 
  1230 
  

  

  = 
  in 
  SwAixsox, 
  1840, 
  T. 
  conula 
  Mart. 
  166. 
  f. 
  1588 
  fide 
  Haxley, 
  1855, 
  Ipsa 
  Lmn. 
  

  

  Conchyl., 
  p. 
  322; 
  Living. 
  Mediterranean. 
  Pilsbry, 
  1889, 
  Alan. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  XI, 
  pi. 
  65, 
  figs. 
  

  

  70-72 
  

  

  Calliostoma 
  costafiim 
  laqiieatiim 
  Carpenter, 
  ms. 
  

   The 
  holotype 
  of 
  this 
  nude 
  name 
  is 
  in 
  the 
  U. 
  S. 
  National 
  Aluscum, 
  no. 
  15478. 
  It 
  is 
  labelled, 
  

   "Neah 
  Bay, 
  J. 
  G. 
  Swan." 
  The 
  name 
  was 
  never 
  validated 
  by 
  Carpenter. 
  

  

  Calliostoma 
  gemmulatum 
  Carpenter 
  

   (PI. 
  17, 
  figs. 
  7, 
  8) 
  

  

  Calliostoma 
  formosum 
  Carpenter, 
  1864e, 
  Dec, 
  California 
  Acad. 
  Sci., 
  Proc, 
  vol. 
  Ill, 
  p. 
  156 
  

   Calliostoma 
  gemmulatum 
  Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  Aug., 
  p. 
  612, 
  653; 
  Reprint, 
  1872, 
  p. 
  98, 
  139; 
  

   1866, 
  California 
  Acad. 
  Sci., 
  Proc, 
  vol. 
  Ill, 
  p. 
  215 
  new 
  name 
  for 
  C. 
  formosum 
  Carpenter 
  

   not 
  Forbes; 
  Cooper, 
  1867, 
  Geog. 
  Cat. 
  Moll., 
  Geol. 
  Sur. 
  California, 
  p. 
  26; 
  Pilsbry, 
  1889, 
  

   Man. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  XI, 
  p. 
  371, 
  pi. 
  67, 
  fig. 
  54; 
  Williamsox, 
  1892, 
  U. 
  S. 
  Nat. 
  Mus., 
  Proc, 
  

   vol. 
  15, 
  no. 
  898, 
  p. 
  201, 
  pi. 
  XII, 
  fig. 
  3; 
  Arnold, 
  1903. 
  p. 
  330; 
  Dall, 
  1921, 
  p. 
  176; 
  Oldroyd, 
  

   1927, 
  vol 
  II, 
  pt. 
  Ill, 
  p. 
  189; 
  Grant 
  and 
  Gale, 
  1931, 
  p. 
  835; 
  Keen, 
  1937, 
  p. 
  32; 
  Burch, 
  

   1946, 
  no. 
  57, 
  p. 
  30, 
  32; 
  no. 
  58, 
  p. 
  3; 
  Abbott, 
  1954, 
  p. 
  115, 
  fig. 
  33d 
  same 
  fig. 
  as 
  Williamson, 
  

   1892 
  

  

  "Very 
  swollen; 
  painted 
  like 
  cximium: 
  with 
  2 
  principal 
  and 
  2 
  smaller 
  rows 
  of 
  granules." 
  

   [Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  Aug., 
  p. 
  653] 
  

   ". 
  . 
  . 
  State 
  Collection 
  615a. 
  

  

  "C. 
  t. 
  subelevata, 
  brunnescens, 
  fusco-purpureo 
  nebulosa, 
  anfr. 
  VII 
  valde 
  tumentibus, 
  su- 
  

   turis 
  impressis; 
  carinis 
  majoribus 
  in 
  spira 
  duabus, 
  gemmatis, 
  interdum 
  brunneo 
  hue 
  et 
  illuc 
  

   tinctis; 
  serie 
  granulorum 
  minorum 
  prope 
  suturam 
  ; 
  serie 
  quarta 
  minimorum_ 
  inter 
  duas 
  

   carinas; 
  lirulis 
  basalibus 
  circ. 
  IX., 
  fusco 
  maculatis; 
  interstitiis 
  a 
  lineis 
  incrementi 
  corrugatis; 
  

   apertura 
  subquadrata. 
  Long. 
  0.47, 
  long. 
  spir. 
  0.34, 
  lat. 
  0.43, 
  div. 
  68°. 
  

  

  "Hab. 
  San 
  Pedro 
  five; 
  San 
  Diego 
  four 
  dead 
  on 
  beach 
  at 
  low 
  water 
  — 
  very 
  rare. 
  It 
  is 
  

   well 
  distinguished 
  by 
  the 
  two 
  principal 
  necklaces, 
  with 
  smaller 
  rows 
  intercalating. 
  In 
  color- 
  

   ing 
  it 
  resembles 
  C. 
  eximium 
  Reeve 
  (versicolor 
  Menke, 
  Mazatlan, 
  Catal.), 
  from 
  the 
  Gulf 
  of 
  

   California. 
  [Carpenter, 
  1864e, 
  Dec, 
  p. 
  156, 
  C. 
  formosum] 
  

  

  "Calliostoma 
  gemmulatum, 
  Cpr. 
  Br. 
  Assoc 
  Rep. 
  1863, 
  pp. 
  612, 
  653. 
  

   "Syn. 
  C. 
  formosum, 
  Cpr. 
  Proc. 
  Cal. 
  Ac. 
  1864, 
  155: 
  non 
  Forbes. 
  

  

  "While 
  the 
  sheets 
  of 
  the 
  Report 
  were 
  passing 
  through 
  the 
  press, 
  it 
  was 
  fotmd 
  that 
  the 
  

   name 
  had 
  been 
  preoccupied 
  by 
  Forbes. 
  As 
  it 
  happened 
  the 
  Californian 
  sheet 
  was 
  being 
  printed 
  

   simultaneously, 
  and 
  there 
  was 
  no 
  time 
  to 
  make 
  the 
  alteration." 
  [Carpenter, 
  1866a, 
  p. 
  215] 
  

  

  Carpenter's 
  statement 
  (preceding 
  paragraph) 
  settles 
  the 
  question 
  that 
  C. 
  gemmulatum 
  

   is 
  the 
  new 
  name 
  for 
  C. 
  formosum 
  Carpenter 
  and 
  not 
  for 
  C. 
  supragranostim 
  Carpenter 
  (1866a, 
  

   p. 
  214), 
  as 
  indicated 
  by 
  Pilsbry 
  (1889, 
  p. 
  370)^' 
  and 
  followed 
  by 
  Grant 
  and 
  Gale 
  (1931, 
  p. 
  

   836). 
  

  

  The 
  writer 
  made 
  the 
  following 
  notes 
  regarding 
  the 
  specimen 
  labelled 
  type 
  in 
  the 
  L^ 
  S. 
  

   National 
  Museum 
  and 
  figured 
  herein 
  : 
  

  

  Nucleus 
  is 
  present, 
  composed 
  of 
  about 
  two 
  and 
  a 
  half 
  smooth 
  whorls, 
  followed 
  by 
  about 
  

   three-quarters 
  of 
  a 
  whorl 
  which 
  bears 
  faint 
  spiral 
  ribs; 
  the 
  following 
  whorls 
  are 
  sculptured 
  

   with 
  three 
  large 
  nodose 
  spiral 
  ribs, 
  middle 
  rib 
  largest, 
  the 
  posterior 
  the 
  smallest 
  on 
  the 
  

   whorls 
  of 
  the 
  spire; 
  faint 
  spiral 
  striae 
  are 
  present 
  just 
  above 
  the 
  suture. 
  The 
  body 
  is 
  carinated 
  

   at 
  base 
  with 
  four 
  large 
  nodose 
  spirals 
  above 
  ; 
  shoulder 
  spiral 
  is 
  largest, 
  with 
  the 
  smallest 
  just 
  

  

  56 
  Modified. 
  Keen, 
  (1941, 
  p. 
  481). 
  Tadashige 
  Habe, 
  Jime 
  22, 
  1955, 
  personal 
  communication, 
  

   stated 
  that 
  this 
  species 
  has 
  not 
  been 
  found 
  since 
  the 
  original 
  discovery. 
  

  

  s'^ 
  Apparently 
  there 
  is 
  a 
  conflict 
  in 
  references 
  in 
  Pilsbry 
  (1889. 
  p. 
  370, 
  371), 
  for 
  C. 
  for- 
  

   mosum 
  is 
  also 
  properly 
  listed 
  in 
  C. 
  gemmulatum 
  Carpenter. 
  Page 
  155 
  should 
  be 
  page 
  156 
  in 
  

   C. 
  formosum 
  Carpenter 
  reference. 
  

  

  