﻿166 
  ^ 
  AfARTKE 
  ^rnLT.rsCA 
  r)ESCRTBEn 
  Vi\ 
  p. 
  r. 
  carpexter 
  • 
  ^ 
  

  

  Barleeia 
  subtenuis 
  rimata 
  Carpenter 
  

  

  (PI. 
  20, 
  fig. 
  4) 
  

  

  Barleeia 
  (? 
  subtenuis, 
  var.) 
  rimata 
  Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  656; 
  Reprint, 
  1872, 
  p. 
  142; 
  1865, 
  

  

  Jour, 
  de 
  Conchyl., 
  vol. 
  XIII, 
  p. 
  144; 
  Reprint, 
  1872, 
  p. 
  312, 
  Cooper, 
  1867, 
  Geog. 
  Cat. 
  AIoll., 
  

  

  Geol. 
  Sur. 
  California, 
  p. 
  30; 
  Tryon, 
  1887, 
  Man. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  IX, 
  p. 
  393; 
  Dall, 
  1921, 
  p. 
  

  

  156; 
  Oldroyd, 
  1927, 
  vol. 
  II, 
  pt. 
  Ill, 
  p. 
  74; 
  Keen, 
  1937, 
  p. 
  30 
  differentiated; 
  Burch, 
  1945, 
  

  

  no. 
  55, 
  p. 
  24 
  

   Barleeia 
  subtenuis 
  Carpenter, 
  Bartsch, 
  1920, 
  U. 
  S. 
  Nat. 
  AIus., 
  Proc., 
  vol. 
  58, 
  no. 
  2331, 
  p. 
  169 
  

  

  "Whirls 
  [sic] 
  more 
  swollen, 
  [than 
  subtenuis] 
  : 
  base 
  chinked 
  — 
  [Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  656] 
  

  

  "B.t. 
  "B. 
  subtenui" 
  simili; 
  sed 
  paulum 
  tumidiore 
  ; 
  anfractibus 
  minus 
  planatis 
  ; 
  rinia 
  umbili- 
  

   cali 
  conspicua. 
  

  

  "Hab. 
  S. 
  Diego. 
  Cassidy, 
  Cooper. 
  

  

  "Peut-etre 
  cette 
  forme 
  se 
  trouvera-t-elle 
  constituer 
  unc 
  espece 
  distinctc, 
  lorsqu-elle 
  sera 
  

   mieux 
  connue." 
  [Carpenter, 
  1865g, 
  p. 
  144] 
  

  

  Two 
  specimens, 
  in 
  the 
  U. 
  S. 
  National 
  Museum, 
  are 
  segregated 
  with 
  Carpenter 
  types 
  but 
  

   are 
  not 
  marked 
  "type." 
  They 
  are 
  labelled 
  "San 
  Diego 
  Cooper." 
  For 
  lack 
  of 
  more 
  definite 
  

   type 
  material 
  the 
  better 
  preserved 
  of 
  the 
  two 
  is 
  figured 
  herein, 
  and 
  the 
  writer 
  presumes 
  that 
  

   it 
  may 
  eventually 
  be 
  selected 
  as 
  the 
  neotype 
  of 
  the 
  subspecies 
  if 
  such 
  classification 
  seems 
  

   warranted. 
  

  

  As 
  far 
  as 
  the 
  conspicuousncss 
  of 
  the 
  slight 
  umbilical 
  opening 
  is 
  concerned, 
  that 
  of 
  the 
  

   specimens 
  noted 
  would 
  seem 
  to 
  be 
  within 
  legitimate 
  variation 
  of 
  the 
  species. 
  

  

  This 
  name 
  and 
  data 
  are 
  arranged 
  separately 
  from 
  that 
  of 
  the 
  species 
  for 
  easier 
  reference, 
  

   rather 
  than 
  because 
  the 
  writer 
  regards 
  the 
  subspecies 
  as 
  valid. 
  

  

  Specimen 
  figured. 
  — 
  U. 
  S. 
  National 
  Museum, 
  no. 
  23734 
  

  

  Distribution. 
  — 
  San 
  Diego, 
  California 
  (type) 
  

  

  Genus 
  Diala 
  A. 
  Adams, 
  1861 
  

  

  Diala 
  A. 
  Adams, 
  1861, 
  Ann. 
  Mag. 
  Nat. 
  Hist., 
  ser. 
  3, 
  vol. 
  8, 
  p. 
  242, 
  D. 
  varia 
  A. 
  Adams 
  first 
  

  

  of 
  four 
  species 
  described 
  

   Type 
  species 
  by 
  subsequent 
  designation, 
  Sutur, 
  1913, 
  (Man. 
  New 
  Zealand 
  AIoll., 
  p. 
  227''^ 
  

  

  D. 
  varia 
  A. 
  Adam.s, 
  1861, 
  .\nn. 
  Mag. 
  Nat. 
  Hist, 
  ser. 
  3, 
  vol. 
  8, 
  p. 
  243 
  

  

  Recent. 
  China, 
  Korea, 
  and 
  Japan 
  

  

  Tryon 
  (1887, 
  p. 
  282) 
  included 
  D. 
  varia 
  Adams 
  under 
  D. 
  semistriafa 
  Philippi 
  (1849, 
  p. 
  34). 
  

   Tadashige 
  Habe 
  wrote 
  (Aug. 
  8, 
  1950, 
  personal 
  communication) 
  that 
  Diala 
  varia 
  A. 
  Adams 
  

   is 
  not 
  the 
  same 
  as 
  D. 
  semistriata 
  Philippi. 
  

  

  Diala 
  acuta 
  Carpenter 
  

   (PI. 
  22, 
  fig. 
  15) 
  

  

  Diala 
  acuta 
  Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  613, 
  657; 
  Reprint, 
  1872, 
  p. 
  99, 
  143; 
  1866, 
  California 
  Acad. 
  

   Sci., 
  Proc, 
  vol. 
  Ill, 
  p. 
  218; 
  Cooper, 
  1867, 
  Geog. 
  Cat. 
  Moll.. 
  Geol. 
  Sur. 
  California, 
  p. 
  31; 
  

   1870, 
  Amer. 
  Jour. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  VI, 
  p. 
  65; 
  Keep, 
  1887, 
  West 
  Coast 
  Shells, 
  p. 
  62; 
  Cooper, 
  

   1888, 
  7th 
  Ann. 
  Rept. 
  California 
  State 
  Min., 
  p. 
  238; 
  Dall, 
  1921, 
  p. 
  156; 
  Oldroyd, 
  1927, 
  

   vol. 
  II, 
  pt. 
  Ill, 
  p. 
  78; 
  Grant 
  and 
  Gale, 
  1931, 
  p. 
  784; 
  Baily, 
  1935, 
  West 
  Coast 
  Shells 
  

   (Keep), 
  p. 
  201; 
  Keen, 
  1937, 
  p. 
  35; 
  Woodring, 
  Bkamlette 
  and 
  Kew, 
  1946, 
  U. 
  S. 
  Geol. 
  

   Sur., 
  Prop. 
  Paper 
  207, 
  p. 
  67; 
  S.mith 
  and 
  Gordon, 
  1948, 
  California 
  .^cad. 
  Sci., 
  Proc, 
  ser. 
  

   4, 
  vol. 
  XXVI, 
  p. 
  197 
  

  

  Litiopa 
  acuta 
  (Carpenter), 
  Tryon, 
  1886, 
  Man. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  IX, 
  p. 
  284 
  

  

  Barleeia 
  acuta 
  (Carpenter), 
  Baker, 
  1902, 
  Nautilus, 
  vol. 
  16, 
  no. 
  4, 
  p. 
  41 
  ; 
  Burch, 
  1945, 
  no. 
  

   55, 
  p. 
  21, 
  22 
  

  

  "Base 
  flattened, 
  sharply 
  angled: 
  turritcd. 
  Bch. 
  — 
  10 
  fm. 
  Cp." 
  [Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  657] 
  

   Oldroyd 
  (1927) 
  republished 
  the 
  description 
  of 
  Carpenter 
  (1866). 
  The 
  following 
  lines 
  

  

  should 
  be 
  added 
  to 
  Oldroyd's 
  (1927) 
  copy 
  of 
  Carpenter's 
  (1866) 
  description: 
  

   ". 
  . 
  . 
  State 
  Collection, 
  no. 
  390 
  

  

  "Hab. 
  Catalina 
  Is. 
  8-10 
  fms. 
  ; 
  on 
  beach 
  to 
  Monterey. 
  Cooper." 
  [Carpenter, 
  1866a, 
  p. 
  218] 
  

   The 
  holotype 
  is 
  in 
  an 
  original 
  Carpenter 
  vial 
  with 
  an 
  original 
  label, 
  "Cp. 
  (type) 
  Cp. 
  390 
  

  

  Diala 
  acuta 
  Cpr. 
  Catalina 
  Is." 
  

  

  ^3 
  Fortunately 
  this 
  is 
  an 
  earlier 
  selection 
  of 
  type 
  species 
  than 
  that 
  of 
  Cossmann 
  (1921, 
  p. 
  

   56). 
  He 
  designated 
  the 
  same 
  species, 
  but 
  a 
  typographical 
  error 
  (fig. 
  88 
  for 
  fig. 
  81) 
  made 
  his 
  

   complete 
  explanation 
  confusing. 
  

  

  