﻿216 
  MARINE 
  MOLLTTSCA 
  DESCRIBED 
  BY 
  P. 
  P. 
  CARPENTER 
  

  

  Siplw 
  rcctirostris 
  (Carpenter), 
  Tkyon, 
  1881, 
  Man., 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  Ill, 
  p. 
  131, 
  pi. 
  53, 
  fig. 
  348 
  

   copy 
  KoBELT, 
  t. 
  45, 
  fig. 
  7 
  poor 
  illustration 
  of 
  type 
  (see 
  Tryon 
  for 
  reference) 
  

  

  Tritonofiisiis 
  {Plicifiisics) 
  rcctirostris 
  (Carpenter), 
  Dall, 
  1902, 
  U. 
  S. 
  Nat. 
  Mus., 
  Proc, 
  

   vol. 
  24, 
  no. 
  1264, 
  p. 
  525, 
  not 
  pi. 
  XXXIV, 
  fig. 
  2 
  

  

  ? 
  Exilia 
  rcctirostris 
  (Carpenter), 
  Dall, 
  1918, 
  U. 
  S. 
  Nat. 
  Mus., 
  Proc., 
  vol. 
  54, 
  p. 
  221 
  

  

  Exilia 
  rcctirostris 
  (Carpenter), 
  Dall, 
  1921, 
  p. 
  92; 
  Oldroyd, 
  1924, 
  Pub. 
  Puget 
  Sound 
  Biol. 
  

   Station, 
  vol. 
  4, 
  p. 
  90 
  not 
  pi. 
  19, 
  fig. 
  2 
  same 
  as 
  Dall, 
  1902, 
  pi. 
  XXXIV, 
  fig. 
  2; 
  Oldroyd, 
  

   1927, 
  vol. 
  II, 
  pt. 
  I, 
  p. 
  206, 
  not 
  pi. 
  6, 
  fig. 
  7, 
  pi. 
  28, 
  fig. 
  2 
  same 
  as 
  Dall, 
  1902, 
  pi. 
  XXXIV, 
  

   fig. 
  2 
  

  

  Exilioidca 
  rcctirostris 
  (Carpenter), 
  Grant 
  and 
  Gale, 
  1931, 
  p. 
  665, 
  pi. 
  28, 
  fig. 
  5; 
  Baily, 
  

   1935, 
  West 
  Coast 
  Shells 
  (Keep), 
  p. 
  251, 
  not 
  fig. 
  257 
  same 
  as 
  Dall, 
  1902; 
  Keen, 
  1937, 
  

   p. 
  36; 
  Bentson, 
  1940, 
  Univ. 
  California 
  Pub. 
  Bull. 
  Dept. 
  Geol. 
  Sci., 
  vol. 
  25, 
  no. 
  5, 
  p. 
  203, 
  

   224, 
  pi. 
  1, 
  fig. 
  22 
  " 
  Exiloidea" 
  ; 
  Bartsch, 
  1945, 
  Nautilus, 
  vol. 
  59, 
  no. 
  2, 
  p. 
  61, 
  pi. 
  7, 
  figs. 
  2, 
  

   3, 
  6; 
  BuRCH, 
  1945, 
  no. 
  50, 
  p. 
  16; 
  Woodring, 
  Bramlette, 
  and 
  Kew, 
  1946, 
  U. 
  S. 
  Geol. 
  Sur., 
  

   Prof. 
  Paper 
  207, 
  p. 
  74, 
  pi. 
  32, 
  fig. 
  12; 
  Smith 
  and 
  Gordon, 
  1948, 
  California 
  Acad. 
  Sci., 
  

   Proc, 
  ser. 
  4, 
  vol. 
  XXVI, 
  p. 
  186 
  

  

  "Small, 
  white, 
  smooth, 
  with 
  straight 
  canal." 
  [Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  664] 
  

   A 
  copy 
  of 
  Carpenter's 
  (1865) 
  description 
  has 
  been 
  published 
  by 
  Oldroyd 
  (1927). 
  The 
  

  

  following 
  typographical 
  corrections 
  should 
  be 
  made 
  in 
  her 
  copy 
  : 
  

  

  Line 
  3: 
  insert 
  space 
  between 
  "costulis" 
  and 
  "radiantibus" 
  ; 
  line 
  4: 
  read 
  "lineis" 
  for 
  

  

  "lincis" 
  ; 
  add 
  "div. 
  2>i°" 
  to 
  the 
  dimensions 
  : 
  

   Add: 
  

  

  "Hab. 
  — 
  In 
  sinu 
  Pugetiano, 
  specimen 
  unicum 
  legit 
  Kennerley. 
  

  

  "Aspectu 
  Belam, 
  forma 
  Perronam, 
  nisi 
  labro 
  baud 
  sinuato, 
  commemorat 
  : 
  characteribus 
  

   plurimis 
  subgeneri 
  Siphoni 
  convenit." 
  [Carpenter, 
  1865e, 
  p. 
  64] 
  

  

  Carpenter's 
  first 
  description 
  (1864) 
  of 
  a 
  smooth 
  shell 
  has 
  confused 
  authors 
  such 
  as 
  

   Arnold 
  (1903) 
  who 
  apparently 
  was 
  not 
  aware 
  of 
  Carpenter's 
  later 
  (1865) 
  notes 
  in 
  regard 
  to 
  

   the 
  species. 
  Carpenter 
  at 
  that 
  time 
  described 
  the 
  radiating 
  costae, 
  which, 
  however, 
  are 
  fine. 
  

   Tryon 
  also 
  did 
  not 
  take 
  cognizance 
  of 
  the 
  1865 
  description. 
  He 
  figured 
  a 
  copy 
  of 
  Kobelt's 
  

   illustration, 
  which 
  Tryon 
  stated 
  Dall 
  had 
  sent 
  Kobelt. 
  That 
  drawing 
  and 
  the, 
  later 
  one 
  which 
  

   Dall 
  (1902) 
  used 
  to 
  illustrate 
  the 
  species 
  does 
  not 
  depicit 
  the 
  shell 
  properly. 
  Dall's 
  figure 
  

   resembles 
  E. 
  kelseyi 
  (Dall) 
  figured 
  by 
  Bartsch 
  (1945). 
  

  

  Dall 
  did 
  not 
  state 
  that 
  the 
  specimen 
  figured 
  (1902, 
  no. 
  4815, 
  U. 
  S. 
  National 
  Museum) 
  

   was 
  the 
  type, 
  as 
  was 
  interpreted 
  by 
  Oldroyd 
  and 
  followed 
  by 
  Grant 
  and 
  Gale. 
  The 
  U. 
  S. 
  

   National 
  Museum 
  number 
  of 
  the 
  type 
  is 
  4515. 
  

  

  The 
  confusion 
  in 
  regard 
  to 
  the 
  holotype 
  of 
  this 
  species 
  was 
  rectified 
  by 
  Bentson, 
  who 
  

   included 
  an 
  illustration 
  of 
  the 
  holotype 
  in 
  her 
  paper 
  (1940). 
  That 
  specimen 
  is 
  badly 
  worn. 
  

   Bartsch 
  (1945) 
  included 
  a 
  fine 
  illustration 
  of 
  the 
  shell, 
  operculum, 
  head, 
  and 
  verge 
  

   of 
  the 
  species 
  and 
  discussed 
  the 
  animal 
  in 
  detail. 
  

  

  The 
  holotype 
  has 
  a 
  label, 
  "Puget 
  Sound 
  Dr. 
  Kennerley." 
  

  

  Dimensions. 
  — 
  Length 
  45 
  mm.; 
  greatest 
  diameter 
  14 
  mm. 
  (Bentson 
  Fig.) 
  

  

  Holotype. 
  — 
  U. 
  S. 
  National 
  Museum, 
  no. 
  4515 
  

  

  Distribution. 
  — 
  Recent. 
  Puget 
  Sound, 
  Washington 
  (type) 
  ; 
  Behm 
  Canal, 
  Alaska, 
  to 
  Cape 
  

   San 
  Quintin, 
  Lower 
  California 
  (Dall). 
  Pleistocene. 
  California 
  (Arnold; 
  Grant 
  and 
  Gale; 
  

   Willett, 
  1937; 
  Woodring, 
  Bramlette, 
  and 
  Kew) 
  

  

  Genus 
  Kelletia 
  Fischer, 
  1884 
  

  

  Kelletia 
  Fischer, 
  1884, 
  Alan, 
  de 
  Conchyliol., 
  p. 
  625 
  (Boyle 
  ms) 
  

  

  Type 
  species 
  by 
  monotypy 
  Siphonalia 
  kelleti 
  (Forbes), 
  1850, 
  Zool. 
  Soc. 
  London, 
  Proc., 
  

   p. 
  274, 
  pi. 
  IX, 
  fig. 
  10. 
  Recent. 
  Santa 
  Barbara, 
  California, 
  to 
  San 
  Quintin 
  Bay, 
  Lower 
  

   California. 
  i°5 
  

  

  ? 
  Kelletia 
  kelletii 
  (Forbes), 
  1850, 
  young 
  

   Siphonalia 
  fuscotincta 
  Carpenter 
  

   (PI. 
  24, 
  fig. 
  1) 
  

  

  Siphonalia 
  fuscotincta 
  Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  537, 
  663; 
  Reprint, 
  1872, 
  p. 
  23, 
  149; 
  1865, 
  Ann. 
  

   Mag. 
  Nat. 
  Hist., 
  ser. 
  3, 
  vol. 
  XV^ 
  p. 
  398; 
  Reprint, 
  1872, 
  p. 
  288; 
  Cooper, 
  1867, 
  Geog. 
  Cat. 
  

  

  105 
  Japan 
  is 
  included 
  in 
  the 
  range 
  of 
  this 
  species 
  by 
  autliors, 
  but 
  Keen 
  (1941, 
  p. 
  481) 
  

   suggested 
  that 
  the 
  Japanese 
  form 
  is 
  an 
  unnamed 
  species. 
  

  

  