﻿GASTROPODA 
  217 
  

  

  Moll., 
  Geol. 
  Sur. 
  California, 
  p. 
  38; 
  1871, 
  Amer. 
  Jour. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  VI, 
  p. 
  70; 
  Tryox, 
  

   1881, 
  Mail. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  Ill, 
  p. 
  134 
  

  

  "Like 
  the 
  same 
  [S. 
  kellettii] 
  in 
  extreme 
  miniature." 
  [Carpenter, 
  1864b 
  p. 
  663] 
  

  

  "S. 
  testa 
  minima, 
  turrita, 
  albida, 
  apicem 
  versus 
  fusco 
  tincta 
  ; 
  anfr. 
  nucl. 
  ii, 
  compactis, 
  

   subplanatis, 
  apice 
  niamillato; 
  norm. 
  IV., 
  convexis, 
  suturis 
  impressis 
  ; 
  costis 
  radiantibus 
  

   rotundatis, 
  tumentibus, 
  basim 
  versus 
  evanidis, 
  interstitiis 
  undulatis, 
  subaequantibus, 
  lirulis 
  

   crebis 
  spiralibus, 
  costas 
  superantibus 
  ; 
  apertura 
  pyriformi 
  in 
  canalem 
  brevem 
  apertum 
  con- 
  

   tortum 
  producta; 
  labro 
  acuto; 
  labio 
  baud 
  conspicuo; 
  columella 
  canalem 
  versus 
  valde 
  

   contorta. 
  Long. 
  .17, 
  long. 
  spir. 
  .1, 
  lat. 
  .08, 
  div. 
  32°. 
  

  

  "Hab. 
  Sta. 
  Barbara 
  {Jezi'ctt). 
  

  

  "The 
  unique 
  specimen 
  is 
  like 
  a 
  minute 
  edition 
  of 
  Siphonalia 
  Kellettii, 
  but 
  does 
  not 
  ac- 
  

   cord 
  with 
  the 
  young 
  of 
  that 
  or 
  of 
  any 
  other 
  species 
  known 
  in 
  the 
  region. 
  It 
  is 
  probably 
  not 
  

   mature." 
  [Carpenter, 
  1865h, 
  p. 
  398] 
  

  

  The 
  holotype 
  of 
  this 
  form 
  is 
  in 
  the 
  Redpath 
  Museum. 
  It 
  bears 
  a 
  label 
  "unique 
  type 
  Sta 
  

   Barbara 
  Jewett" 
  and 
  consists 
  of 
  one 
  specimen. 
  The 
  holotype 
  is 
  figured 
  herein. 
  It 
  is, 
  as 
  

   Carpenter 
  stated, 
  an 
  immature 
  shell, 
  5 
  mm. 
  in 
  length. 
  

  

  Holotype. 
  — 
  Redpath 
  ^luseum, 
  no. 
  3138 
  

  

  Distribution. 
  — 
  Santa 
  Barbara, 
  California 
  (type) 
  

  

  Family 
  Olividae 
  

   Genus 
  Olivella 
  Swainson, 
  1831 
  

  

  Olivclla 
  SwAiNsox, 
  1831, 
  Zool. 
  Illustrations, 
  ser. 
  2, 
  vol. 
  2, 
  (13), 
  Expl. 
  pi. 
  58, 
  Oliva, 
  pi. 
  2 
  

  

  Type 
  species 
  by 
  subsequent 
  designation 
  Dall, 
  1909, 
  U. 
  S. 
  Geol. 
  Sur., 
  Prof. 
  Paper 
  59, 
  p. 
  31, 
  

  

  Oliva 
  purpurata 
  Swainson 
  = 
  O. 
  dama 
  Mawe, 
  Wood, 
  1828, 
  Suppl. 
  Index 
  Test., 
  pi. 
  5, 
  

  

  [pi. 
  4], 
  fig. 
  37a 
  fide 
  Tryon, 
  1883. 
  Recent. 
  West 
  Coast 
  Alexico. 
  Tryon, 
  1883, 
  Man. 
  

  

  Conch., 
  vol. 
  V, 
  pi. 
  17, 
  fig. 
  39 
  copy 
  Sowerby, 
  1870, 
  Thes. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  4, 
  pi. 
  349, 
  fig. 
  369 
  

  

  Olivella 
  baetica 
  Marrat 
  in 
  Sow'erby 
  

   (PI. 
  24, 
  figs. 
  2-4, 
  6-8) 
  

  

  Olivella 
  baetica 
  Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  537, 
  541, 
  590, 
  661 
  ; 
  Reprint, 
  1872, 
  p. 
  23, 
  27, 
  76, 
  100, 
  

   147 
  nomen 
  nudum; 
  Cooper, 
  1867, 
  Geog. 
  Cat. 
  Moll., 
  Geol. 
  Sur. 
  California, 
  p. 
  2>6; 
  Gabb, 
  

  

  1869, 
  Pal. 
  California, 
  vol. 
  II, 
  p. 
  75 
  {boetica) 
  under 
  0. 
  pedroana 
  (Conrad) 
  ; 
  Cooper, 
  

  

  1870, 
  Amer. 
  Jour. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  VI, 
  p. 
  68; 
  Marrat 
  in 
  Sowerby, 
  1871, 
  Thes. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  

   IV, 
  p. 
  35, 
  pi. 
  350, 
  figs. 
  409, 
  410; 
  Tryon, 
  1883, 
  Man. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  V, 
  p. 
  71, 
  pi. 
  17, 
  figs. 
  

   28-31, 
  34; 
  Williamson, 
  1892, 
  U. 
  S. 
  Nat. 
  Mus., 
  Proc., 
  vol. 
  15, 
  no. 
  898, 
  p. 
  212, 
  pi. 
  XIX, 
  

   fig. 
  7; 
  Arnold, 
  1903, 
  p. 
  221 
  boetica 
  in 
  synonymy 
  of 
  O. 
  pedroana 
  (Conrad); 
  Pack.\rd, 
  

   1918, 
  Univ. 
  California 
  Pub. 
  Zool., 
  vol. 
  14, 
  p. 
  341 
  under 
  O. 
  pedroana 
  (Conrad) 
  ; 
  T. 
  S. 
  

   Oldroyd, 
  1921, 
  Nautilus, 
  vol. 
  34, 
  no. 
  4, 
  p. 
  117, 
  pi. 
  V, 
  figs. 
  1, 
  la; 
  figs. 
  2, 
  3 
  varieties 
  

   (boetica); 
  Dall, 
  1921, 
  p. 
  85, 
  pi. 
  15, 
  fig. 
  1 
  boetica; 
  I. 
  S. 
  Oldroyd, 
  1924, 
  Pub. 
  Puget 
  

   Sound 
  Biol. 
  Station, 
  vol. 
  4, 
  p. 
  88, 
  pi. 
  22, 
  figs. 
  7, 
  8 
  (boetica) 
  same 
  as 
  T. 
  S. 
  Oldroy'd, 
  1921, 
  

   pi. 
  V, 
  figs. 
  1, 
  la; 
  I. 
  S. 
  Oldroyd, 
  1927, 
  vol. 
  Ill, 
  pt. 
  I, 
  p. 
  163, 
  pi. 
  26, 
  figs. 
  22 
  same 
  as 
  T. 
  S. 
  

   Oldroyd, 
  1921, 
  fig. 
  1, 
  22a 
  (boetica); 
  Grant 
  and 
  Gale, 
  1931, 
  p. 
  627; 
  Berry, 
  1935, 
  

   Malacol. 
  Soc. 
  London, 
  Proc, 
  vol. 
  21, 
  pt. 
  IV, 
  p. 
  263; 
  Baily, 
  1935. 
  West 
  Coast 
  Shells 
  

   (Keep), 
  p. 
  226, 
  fig. 
  216; 
  Keen, 
  1937, 
  p. 
  43; 
  Burch, 
  1945, 
  no. 
  49, 
  p. 
  17, 
  18, 
  20, 
  pi. 
  Ill, 
  fig. 
  

   21 
  : 
  Abbott, 
  1954, 
  p. 
  247, 
  pi. 
  20, 
  fig. 
  q 
  

  

  Cf. 
  Olivella 
  nota 
  Marrat 
  in 
  Sowerby, 
  1871, 
  Thes. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  IV, 
  p. 
  36, 
  pi. 
  351, 
  fig. 
  428 
  

   Vancouver's 
  Island 
  

  

  "Narrow, 
  dull, 
  thin 
  : 
  has 
  been 
  erroneously 
  called 
  amazora, 
  tergina, 
  petiolita, 
  and 
  rufi- 
  

   fasciata." 
  [Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  661] 
  

  

  Carpenter 
  in 
  the 
  preliminary 
  notes 
  (1864b) 
  to 
  the 
  above 
  listed 
  the 
  species 
  from 
  Santa 
  

   Barbara 
  (p. 
  537), 
  Monterey 
  (p. 
  541), 
  and 
  in 
  the 
  final 
  list 
  (p. 
  661) 
  from 
  Santa 
  Barbara, 
  

   Oregon, 
  California, 
  Monterey, 
  Puget 
  Sound, 
  Vancouver, 
  and 
  region 
  between 
  San 
  Diego 
  

   and 
  San 
  Pedro. 
  One 
  may, 
  therefore, 
  deduce 
  that 
  Carpenter 
  was 
  referring 
  to 
  a 
  ubiquitous 
  

   coastal 
  Olivella 
  north 
  of 
  the 
  Gulf 
  of 
  California. 
  Carpenter 
  compared 
  his 
  0. 
  baetica 
  (p. 
  590) 
  

   with 
  Conrad's 
  O. 
  pedroana, 
  and 
  his 
  procedure 
  was 
  followed 
  by 
  Gabb 
  (1869). 
  Carpenter 
  did 
  

   not 
  later 
  amplify 
  the 
  above 
  brief 
  and 
  unidentifiable 
  remarks 
  and 
  thereby 
  indicate, 
  as 
  was 
  

   his 
  custom, 
  particular 
  specimens 
  from 
  a 
  certain 
  locality. 
  

  

  This 
  species 
  was 
  never 
  adequately 
  described 
  by 
  Carpenter. 
  It 
  lacked 
  an 
  illustration, 
  a 
  

   type, 
  and 
  a 
  type 
  locality. 
  Either 
  of 
  the 
  first 
  two 
  items 
  would 
  compensate 
  for 
  the 
  useless 
  

  

  