﻿GASTROPODA 
  247 
  

  

  no. 
  1906, 
  p. 
  306, 
  337; 
  Dall, 
  1921, 
  p. 
  133; 
  Oldroyd, 
  1927, 
  vol. 
  Ill, 
  pt. 
  II, 
  p. 
  196, 
  pi. 
  66, 
  

  

  fig. 
  3; 
  pi. 
  63, 
  fig. 
  3 
  lectotype 
  same 
  fig. 
  as 
  Dall 
  and 
  Baktsch, 
  1907, 
  1909; 
  Keen, 
  1937, 
  

  

  p. 
  42; 
  BuRCH, 
  1946, 
  no. 
  61, 
  p. 
  42 
  

  

  For 
  a 
  discussion 
  of 
  the 
  name 
  see 
  O. 
  inflata 
  Carpenter. 
  For 
  description 
  and 
  illustration 
  of 
  

   the 
  species 
  see 
  Dall 
  and 
  Bartsch 
  (1907; 
  1909; 
  repeated 
  in 
  Oldroyd, 
  1927). 
  

  

  Dimensions. 
  — 
  Length 
  6.1 
  mm., 
  diameter 
  3.3 
  mm. 
  (lectotype, 
  Dall 
  and 
  Bartsch) 
  

  

  Lectotype. 
  — 
  U. 
  S. 
  National 
  Museum, 
  no. 
  15521c 
  (also 
  includes 
  one 
  paratype, 
  second 
  of 
  

   the 
  original 
  syntypes) 
  

  

  Distribution. 
  — 
  Santa 
  Barbara, 
  California 
  (type) 
  

  

  Odostomia 
  (Evalca) 
  tenuis 
  Carpenter 
  

  

  Odostomia 
  tenuis 
  Carpenter 
  was 
  described 
  by 
  Carpenter 
  (1857a, 
  p. 
  412). 
  Dall 
  and 
  Bartsch 
  

   (1909, 
  pi. 
  22, 
  fig. 
  3) 
  figured 
  a 
  Carpenter 
  drawing 
  of 
  the 
  type 
  in 
  the 
  British 
  Aluseum 
  

   (Natural 
  History). 
  

  

  The 
  O. 
  tenuis 
  "Carpenter" 
  of 
  Dall 
  and 
  Bartsch 
  in 
  Arnold 
  (1903, 
  p. 
  281, 
  pi. 
  1, 
  fig. 
  14) 
  is 
  not 
  

   the 
  O. 
  tenuis 
  Carpenter 
  (1857). 
  Dall 
  and 
  Bartsch 
  described 
  that 
  shell 
  as 
  O. 
  (Evalea) 
  

   (1909, 
  p. 
  199, 
  pi. 
  22, 
  fig. 
  4). 
  The 
  holotype 
  is 
  from 
  Santa 
  Rosa 
  Island, 
  California. 
  

   O. 
  tenuis 
  Carpenter 
  (1857a) 
  is 
  also 
  not 
  the 
  O. 
  tenuis 
  Dall 
  (1897, 
  p. 
  14) 
  as 
  Munnola 
  

   tenuis). 
  That 
  species 
  was 
  renamed 
  O. 
  pharcida 
  by 
  Dall 
  and 
  Bartsch 
  (1907). 
  

  

  Odostomia 
  (Evalea) 
  tenuisculpta 
  Carpenter 
  

   (PI. 
  21, 
  figs. 
  9, 
  10) 
  

  

  Odostomia 
  tenuisculpta 
  Carpenter, 
  1864b, 
  p. 
  628, 
  659; 
  Reprint, 
  1872, 
  p. 
  114, 
  145; 
  1865, 
  Ann. 
  

   Mag. 
  Nat. 
  Hist., 
  ser. 
  3, 
  vol. 
  XV, 
  p. 
  30; 
  Reprint, 
  1872, 
  p. 
  244; 
  Cooper, 
  1867, 
  Geog. 
  Cat. 
  

   Moll., 
  Geol. 
  Sur. 
  California, 
  p. 
  33 
  ; 
  Tryon, 
  1886, 
  Man. 
  Conch., 
  vol. 
  VIII, 
  p. 
  359, 
  p. 
  78, 
  

   fig. 
  49 
  var. 
  incisa 
  

  

  Odostomia 
  straminea 
  Carpenter, 
  1865, 
  Jour. 
  de. 
  Conchyliol., 
  vol. 
  XIII, 
  p. 
  146; 
  Reprint, 
  

   1872, 
  p. 
  314; 
  Cooper, 
  1867, 
  Geog. 
  Cat. 
  Moll., 
  Geol. 
  Sur. 
  California, 
  p. 
  33; 
  fide 
  Dall 
  and 
  

   Bartsch, 
  1907, 
  p. 
  527 
  ;_ 
  1909, 
  p. 
  206; 
  Burch, 
  1946, 
  no. 
  61, 
  p. 
  44 
  

  

  Odostomia 
  (Evalea) 
  tenuisculpta 
  (Carpenter), 
  Dall 
  and 
  Bartsch, 
  1907, 
  U. 
  S. 
  Nat. 
  Mus., 
  

   Proc, 
  vol. 
  33, 
  p. 
  527, 
  pi. 
  XLVII, 
  fig. 
  6; 
  1909. 
  U. 
  S. 
  Nat. 
  Mus., 
  Bull. 
  68, 
  p. 
  206, 
  pi. 
  23, 
  

   fig. 
  2 
  same 
  figure 
  as 
  1907 
  ?type; 
  Bartsch, 
  1912, 
  U. 
  S. 
  Nat. 
  Mus., 
  Proc., 
  vol. 
  42, 
  no. 
  

   1906, 
  p. 
  306, 
  338; 
  Dall, 
  1921, 
  p. 
  134; 
  Oldroyd, 
  1924, 
  Pub. 
  Puget 
  Sound 
  Biol. 
  Station, 
  

   vol. 
  4, 
  p. 
  127. 
  1927, 
  vol. 
  II, 
  pt. 
  II, 
  p. 
  207, 
  pi. 
  63, 
  fig. 
  2 
  same 
  as 
  Dall 
  and 
  Bartsch, 
  

   1909; 
  pi. 
  66, 
  fig. 
  6 
  same 
  as 
  Dall 
  and 
  Bartsch, 
  1907; 
  Baily. 
  1935, 
  West 
  Coast 
  Shells 
  

   (Keep), 
  p. 
  185; 
  Keen, 
  1937, 
  p. 
  43; 
  Burch, 
  1946, 
  no. 
  61, 
  p. 
  13, 
  14, 
  15, 
  44; 
  Smith 
  and 
  

   Gordon, 
  1948, 
  California 
  Acad. 
  Sci., 
  Proc, 
  ser. 
  4, 
  vol. 
  XXVI, 
  p. 
  194 
  

  

  "Like 
  sjiblirtilata, 
  Maz. 
  Cat. 
  no. 
  487, 
  with 
  obsolete 
  sculpture 
  througliout." 
  [Carpenter 
  

   1864b, 
  p. 
  659] 
  

  

  Oldroyd 
  (1927) 
  republished 
  Carpenter's 
  description 
  (1865). 
  The 
  following 
  changes 
  

   should 
  be 
  made 
  in 
  her 
  copy 
  : 
  

   Delete 
  "poll." 
  

   Add: 
  ". 
  . 
  . 
  div. 
  60°. 
  

  

  "Hah. 
  Neeah 
  Bay; 
  one 
  specimen 
  {Szvan) 
  ." 
  [Carpenter, 
  1865a, 
  p. 
  30] 
  

   Dall 
  and 
  Bartsch 
  presented 
  a 
  detailed 
  description 
  of 
  the 
  species 
  (1907) 
  and 
  rei>eated 
  it 
  

   later 
  (1909). 
  In 
  regard 
  to 
  the 
  measurement 
  and 
  category 
  of 
  the 
  specimen 
  figured 
  there 
  is 
  a 
  

   discrepancy. 
  In 
  the 
  text 
  (1907, 
  p. 
  527) 
  the 
  specimen 
  figured 
  was 
  said 
  to 
  be 
  one 
  of 
  two 
  

   specimens 
  from 
  the 
  type 
  locality 
  by 
  the 
  original 
  collector 
  but 
  not 
  the 
  holotype. 
  Its 
  length 
  

   was 
  given 
  as 
  5.3 
  mm. 
  which 
  coincides 
  with 
  that 
  in 
  the 
  explanation 
  of 
  the 
  plate 
  (pi. 
  XLVII, 
  

   fig. 
  6). 
  However, 
  the 
  same 
  drawing 
  is 
  included 
  later 
  (1909, 
  pi. 
  23, 
  fig. 
  2), 
  but 
  in 
  the 
  explana- 
  

   tion 
  of 
  the 
  plate 
  it 
  is 
  listed 
  as 
  type 
  with 
  the 
  length 
  2.3 
  mm., 
  which 
  is 
  the 
  length 
  of 
  the 
  holo- 
  

   type 
  (p. 
  206). 
  Examining 
  the 
  holotype 
  one 
  finds 
  that 
  the 
  drawing 
  of 
  Dall 
  and 
  Bartsch 
  is 
  

   of 
  the 
  holotype 
  which 
  is 
  no. 
  15520. 
  It 
  is 
  smaller 
  than 
  another 
  specimen 
  (no. 
  46483 
  of 
  Dall 
  

   and 
  Bartsch, 
  p. 
  206) 
  which 
  is 
  segregated. 
  Dall 
  and 
  Bartsch, 
  therefore, 
  figured 
  the 
  holotype 
  

   (1907; 
  1909, 
  explanation 
  pi. 
  23, 
  fig. 
  2, 
  1909 
  is 
  correct). 
  A 
  photograph 
  of 
  the 
  holotype 
  is 
  

   included 
  herein 
  (pi. 
  21, 
  figs. 
  9, 
  10). 
  

  

  Dall 
  and 
  Bartsch 
  determined 
  O. 
  straminea 
  Carpenter 
  (described 
  from 
  Cape 
  San 
  Lucas) 
  

   as 
  a 
  southern 
  smooth 
  form 
  of 
  this 
  species. 
  

  

  