REFERENCES 329 



48. Muller, H. J., Age in relation to the frequency of spontaneous mutations in 

 Drosophila, Yearbook Am. Phil. Soc, 1945: 150-153, 1946. 



49. Muller, H. J., The gene. Pilgrim Trust Lecture for 1945, Proc. Roy. Soc, B134: 

 1-37, 1947. 



50. Muller, H. J., Is radiation a menace to posterity? Science News Letter (under 

 editor's title "The menace of radiation"), 55: 374, 379-380, 1949. 



51. Muller, H. J., Radiation damage to the genetic material, Am. Scientist, Pt. I: 

 38: 33-59, 126, 1950; Pt. II: 38: 399-425, 1950. 



52. Muller, H. J., Some present problems in the genetic effects of radiation, /. Cellular 

 Conip. Physiol, 35: Supplement 1, 9-70, 1950. 



53. Muller, H. J., Partial dominance in relation to the need for studying induced 

 mutations individually, J. Cellular Comp. Physiol., 35: Supplement 1, 205-210, 

 1950. 



54. Muller, H. J., Our load of mutations. Am. J. Hum. Genetics, 2: 111-176. 



55. Muller, H. J., and E. Altenburg, The rate of change of hereditary factors in 

 Drosophila, Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 17: 10-14, 1919. 



56. Muller, H. J., and L. M. Mott-Smith, Evidence that natural radioactivity is 

 inadequate to explain the frequency of "natural" mutations, Proc. Natl. Acad. 

 Sci., 16:277-285, 1930. 



57. Muller, H. J., J. I. Valencia, and R. M. Valencia, The frequency of spontaneous 

 mutations at individual loci in Drosophila (abstract), Rec. Genetics Soc. Amer., 

 18: 105-106, 1949. 



58. Muller, H. J., R. M. Valencia, and J. I. Valencia, The production of mutations 

 at individual loci in Drosophila by irradiation of oocytes and oogonia (abstract), 

 Rec. Genetics Soc. Amer., 18: 106, 1949. 



59. Muller, H. J., and S. L. Campbell, Further evidence that most "recessive" genes 

 exert their main action as dominants (in press). 



60. Neel, J. V., A study of cases of high mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster , 

 Genetics, 27:519-536, 1942. 



61. Novick, A., and L. Szilard, Experiments on light-reactivation of ultraviolet in- 

 activated bacteria, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 35: 591-600, 1949. 



62. Oliver, C. P., The effect of varying the duration of X-ray treatment upon the 

 frequency of mutation, Science, 71: 44-46, 1930. 



63. Opatowski, I., On the interpretation of the dose-frequency curve in radiogenetics. 

 Genetics, 35: 56-59, 1950. 



64. Patt, H. M., E. B. Tyree, R. L. Straube, and D. E. Smith, Cysteine protection 

 against X-irradiation, Science, 110: 213-214, 1949. 



65. Sell-Beleites, I., and A. Catsch, Mutationsauslosung durch ultraviolettes Licht 

 bei Drosophila, Z. indukt. Abst.- u. Vererb., 80: 551-557, 1942. 



66. Stone, W. S., O. Wyss, and F. Haas, The production of mutations in Staphylo- 

 coccus aureus by irradiation of the substrate, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 33: 59-66, 

 1947. 



67. Strangeways, T. S. P., and H. E. H. Oakley, The immediate changes observed 

 in tissue cells after exposure to soft X-rays, Proc. Roy. Soc, B95: 373-381, 

 1923. 



68. Swanson, C. P., W. D. McElroy, and H. Miller, The effect of nitrogen mustard 

 pretreatment on the ultraviolet-induced morphological and biochemical muta- 

 tion rate, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 35: 513-518, 1949. 



69. Thoday, J. M., and J. Read, Effect of oxygen on the frequency of chromosome 

 aberrations produced by X-rays, Nature, 160: 608, 1947. 



