— 186 - 



ndte pertinent P. mite v. ambiguum Schinz Kell., Fl. Schweiz, 2. Aufl., 11, 190 (1905) 

 fide Schuster, 1. c. 76 et P. camptocladum Gand. Exs. f. Scliuster 1. c. 58 in nota. 



p. 81: ad nr. 16 adde: Gallia: Remblai de Villez (Seine et Oise) leg. Toussaint fide Schuster, 

 1. c. 75. — Ad nr. 17 adde: P. minus X tomentosum Borb. Exs. fide Schuster, 1. c, 

 59 = P. lapathifolium miserum. — Ad nr. 18: P. lapathifolium dXmite in Bavaria: 

 prope Lindenhof proxime Althegnenberg fide Schuster, 1. c, 76 a Holler coUectum 

 est. — Ad nr. 19: P. lapathifolium X persicaria Vayreda, Plant. Not. (Madrid 1880), 

 149 fide Schuster, 1. c, 58. Folia anguste lanceolata, longe petiolata. Ochreae 

 breviter pilosae et longius ciliatae. Axes inflorescentiae glandulosae. Nervatura 

 perianthii phyUorum nunc P' lapathifolii nunc P' persicariae. Hispania. Germania: 

 prope Germersheim a. Rh. (leg. Ade). 



p. 82: P. Wilmsii etiam observata est in Austria inf. (Seebarn am Kamp leg. Teyber!). 



p. 88: ad P. convolvulus X. dumetorum adde: Synon. ? P asperulum {dumetorum X convol- 

 vulus Zapat. in Anz. Ak. der Wiss. Krakau (1907) nr. 6 (Non vidi). 



p. 93: linea quinta desuper lege : digitale et in expUcatione tabulae 229: 4. Fructus (nonFlos). 



p. 98: ad Chenopodium: Conf. Murr. Zu Prof. Dr. G. v. Becks Bearbeitung der Gattung 

 Chenopodium in Magy. bot. lapok (1907), 303. 



p. 100: ad Exsiccatas Ch' vulvariae adde: Tausch, Fl. Boh., nr. 1324. 



p. 102: ad f. microphyllum adde: Syn. Ch.viride v. microphyllum Coss. Germ., Fl. env. Paris, 

 452 (1845). 



p. 104: ad f. glomerulosum adde: Peterm., Pflanzenschliiss., 373 (1846). Conf. etiam Murr in 

 Magy. bot. lap. (1906) 106; (1907) 304. 



p. 105: ad /?. striatum: ? amaranticolor Coste et Reyn fide Murr in Magy. bot. lap. (1907) 

 305 delendum est. 



p. 106: f. elegans Murr in prima linea est Atriplex spec quam ob rem delenda. Conf. 

 Murr, 1. c. (1907), 306. — f. opuliforme Murr ad Ch. pseudo-Borbasii ducendum 

 est [Murr, 1. c (1907) 306] — de i. jjseudostriato Coiif Murr, 1. c, 306. - f Neu- 

 manni (linea septima desuper) fide Murr, 1. c pro Ch. alboXviridi habetur. 



p. 107: ad f. concatenatum Thum. adde: Conf. Murr in Magy. bot. lap. (1907), 305. 



p. 109: ad Uneam 7. ab imo adde: opidifoliumXficifolium est fide Murr, 1. c, 307 forma 

 C/i' striati foUis egregie protractis. 



p. 110: ad Ch.Zschakei adde Conf Issler in Ost. bot. Zeit. (1906), 474. Sec Murr in Magy. 

 bot. lap. (1907) 307 congruit cum Ch" Berlandieri Moqu. 



p. 111: ad nr. 9. Ch. Diirerianum congruit cum Ch" hircino Schrad., quam obrem diagnosis 

 mutanda est: 



9. Chenopodium hircinum Schrad., Ind. sem. hort. Gott. (1833), 2; Fenzl in Mart., 

 Fl. Bras., V 1, t. 45; Moqu. in DC, Prodr., XIH 2, 66. — Ch. bonariense Ten., Ind. 

 sem. hort. Neap. (1833), 13; Moqu., I. c, 71. — 67*. trilobum Issler in AUg. bot. Zeit. 

 (1902), 174. — Ch.ficifoliumXopulifolium Murr in Deutsch. bot. Mon. (1886), 36, 

 Taf. II, fig. 2 (foUa rameaUa) = Ch. Bilrerianum Murr, a. a. 0. (1901) 53 et in 

 Magy. bot.lap.(1902), 340, tab.II 17; Conf. Murr in AUg. bot. Zeit. (1903), 199 cum 

 tab. et in Magy. bot. lap. (1907), 307. Caulis herbaceus, paulo angulosus. FoUa longe 

 petiolata, e basi cuneata ovato-rhombea, varie lobato-dentata, saepe subtriloba cuni 

 lobis lateralibus bilobis (rarius omnibus lobis integris), supra viridia, subtus farinoso- 



