ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS. 
As might be expected in a work issued in parts, and extending over a long period of 
time, many inequalities of treatment will be found. The following corrections are some of the 
more noticeable: 
Page 14-2, line 15, for “A. platyphyllus,” read C. platyphyllus. 
“15-2, “ 2 from bottom, for “lava,” read Clava. 
. 23-2, “21 for “ Maritiima,” read Maritima. 
“35-2, ‘* 5, for “Stmwarouba,” read Sunaruba. 
“35-2, “ 2 from bottom, the same correction. 
“ 41-3, foot-note, for “ Rhamneitne,” read Rhamnetine. 
“46-2, line 6, for “Copiava,” read Copaiva. 
“". 46-2,. “. 20, for “Cyitcus,” read Cymsns, 
“ 46-3, “ 109, for “augustifolia,” read angustifolia. 
“ 46-3, “ 28, for “Psorala,” read Psoralea. 
“49-2, “ 16, for “Dipterix,” read Dipteryx. 
mi - 97... Ofer “ reeping, read: Creeping. 
“85-2, “ 24, for “ Etsupra,” read Et supra. 
“ 110-2, “ 13 from bottom, for ‘ emale,” read female. 
“ 128-2, “ 12 from bottom, for “chinensis,” read Chinensis. 
“ 129-2, “ 14, for “ Centuary,” read Centaury. : é 
“133, last foot-note is now unnecessary. 
“ 141, line 3 from bottom, for “ smoorcroftianum,” read Moorcroftianum. 
“ 134-3, Description of Plate, for “A cluster of Follicles,” read A follicle; and add, 5. A oe 
section of the root. 
“ 147-2, line 17, for “ cyparissias,” read Cyparissias. 
“ 160-3, “ 10, for “cerefera,” read cerifera. 
“ 164-2, foot-note, for “Ut supra,” read Et supra. 
Plate 66 should be titled THAsPIuM AUREUM. 
“107, the spike of flowers is not broad enough; it should have been more fusiform. As 5 . 
it now is, the plate much more resembles Plantago Rugelii than P. begat 
“158, should be titled CasTANEA VESCA, VAR. AMERICANA. 
