Hurler and Strecker — Amphibians and Reptiles of Arkansas. 13 



ARKANSAS LOCALITIES KEFERRED TO IN THIS PAPER. 



Locality. Collector. No. of Species. 



Altus, Franklin Co. Hurter 2 



Arkadelphia, Clark Co. Meek 1 



Clarksville, Johnson Co. Meek 1 



Donaldson, Hot Springs Co. Meek 1 



Eureka Springs, Carroll Co. Hurter 3 



Fort Smith, Sebastian Co. Eustis, Whipple, 26 



Shumard, Pierson 



Fayette ville, Washington Co. Meek 5 



Green way, Clay Co. Meek 24 



Hot Springs, Garland Co. Combs, Hurter 37 



Little Rock, Pulaski Co. Hurter, Fordyce 18 



Paragould, Green Co. Hurter 14 



Pine Bluff, Jefferson Co. Hurter 7 



Texarkana, Miller Co. Hurter 4 



Miscellaneous 9 



From the foregoing table the reader can very readily 

 see that we have definite records for only about fifteen 

 out of the seventy-five counties in the State. Hot 

 Springs, Garland County, furnished the largest number 

 of species as a result of the work of two collectors. Combs 

 spent nearly three years in this locality and obtained in 

 all thirty-six species and sub-species. Hurter visited 

 Hot Springs on two occasions, obtaining examples of 

 seventeen species, only one of which had not previously 

 been collected by Combs. At Fort Smith, the earlier 

 collectors, Eustis, Shumard and Whipple, obtained six 

 species that were not found there by Pierson in 1896-97. 

 The results of Meek's work at Greenway, Clay County, 

 and Hurter 's at Paragould, Green County, furnish an 

 interesting contrast as the two counties are adjoining. 

 Meek collected twenty-four species, Hurter only four- 

 teen, but the two lots contain representatives of thirty- 

 six different forms, Sceloporus undulatus Lat. and 

 Ambystoma opacum Gravenhorst being the only two 

 species obtained by both collectors. 



COMPARATIVE TABLE OF MISSOURI AND ARKANSAS REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS. 



