Ball — Notes on Some Western Willoics. 71 



Spkcimkns examined. — Anderson, Santa Cruz, Calif. 1877. — Austin, 



Mrs., 765, Calif. Fl. 1896. — Coues and Palmer, Ft. Whipple, Ariz. ( ), 



Sept. 9, 1865. — Engelmann, ( ), Santa Cruz, Calif. Sept. 8, 1880. — Han- 



sen, 1510, Fl.Seq. GiganteaReg. 1896. — Heller, 57i5, N. Mex. PI., -S". Bon- 

 plandia (n«), 1897. — Jones, 5020, West. Fl., S. nigra var. amygdaloides, 

 1894; Fl. Calif., S. nigra, Bishop, May 15, 1897. — Kellogg and McLean, 



C ), San Jose, Calif. 1876. — Lemraon, 2P, 26>, Fl. Calif. 1875; 105, »S. 



n?V«; Sierra Vailey, Calif. 187-. — Orcutt, 13, ( ), Jacumbe, 1889. — 



Palmer, 465, Walnut Grove, Ariz. 1876. — Parish Brop., 545, PI. So. Calif. 

 1881. — Parry, 307, Pac. Coast. Fl. 1882. — Trask, Blanche, Sta. Catalina 

 Id. Calif. 1896, (two specimens labeled S. lasiolepis and 8. laevigata respect- 

 ively are each a mixture of these two species). — Wright, S. lasiandra var. 

 lancifolia, San Bernardino, Calif. 1880. 



The following specimens represent, by the size and charac- 

 ter of the fertile aments, the var. congesia Bebb: — 



Howell, 1393, Pac. Coast PL, Calif. 1889. — Kellogg and Harford, 925, 

 ( ), Calif. 1868-9. — Palmer, 362., So. Pt. San Diego Co. Calif. ( ), 



1875. 



S. LASIANDRA Bentham. 



^S*. lasiandra Benth., PI. Hartw. 335. 1857. — Torrey, Bot. Whipple Exped. 

 Pac. R. R. Rept. 4: 138. (82). 1857. — Bebb in Bot. Calif. 2: 84. 1880.— 

 Bebb, Bot. Gaz. 16: 103. 1898. — Greene, Man. Bot. Biy Reg. 299. 1874. — 

 Sargent, Silva 9: 115. pi. 469. 1896. — Hooker and Arnott, (as S. Hoffmanni- 

 ana Sm), Bot. Beechey 159. 1833 (?). (1841;. 



S. speciosa Nntt., Sylva 1 : 58. pi. 17. 1842. 



S. liicida Willd. ,?. foliis lanceolatis Hooker, Fl. Bor.-Ara. 2 : 148. 1839 (?) . 

 (1840). (Columbia R. habitat). 



IS. lucida var. angusUfolia forma lasiandra Andersson, Sal. Bor.-Am.* 54. 

 (8). 1858, — Torrey, Bot. Boundary Survey 204. 1859. 



S. lucida var. macrophyUn Anders., Monog. Sal. 32. 1867. — Anders, in 

 DC. Prod. 16'':205. 1868. —Bebb, Bot. Gaz. 16: 103. 1891. 



8. arguta var. lasiandra Andersson, Monog. Sal. 33. 1867. — Anders, in 

 DC. Prod. 162 : 206. 1868. 



8. lancifolia Andersson, Monog. Sal. 34. /. 23. 1867. — Anderss. in DC. 

 Prod. 162 : 206. 1868. 



S. lasiandra var. lancifolia Bebb in Bot. Calif. 2: 84. 1880. — Macoun, 

 Cat. Canad. PI. 450. 1886. — Parish, Zoe l : 347. 1894. 



8. lasiandra var. typica Bebb in Bot. Calif. 2 : 84. 1880. — Macoun, Cat. 

 Canad. PI. 449. 1886. 



8. lasiandra var. Z,?/a»n Sargent, Gard. & For. 8:463. 1895. — Sargent, 

 Silva 9: UZ.pl. 470. 1896. 



8. Lyallii (Sarg.) Heller, Ball. Torr. Bot. Club 25 : 580. 1898. 



The treatment given this willow in the Botany of California 

 makes it possible to refer all forms to the three varieties, and 



♦ Anderason's Salices Boreali-Americanae was published in Proc. Am. 

 Acad. Sci. 4: 50-78. 1858. 



