BY R. TATE AND W. L. MAY. 457 



as sufficient to separate C. paucirucjis as insisted upon by 

 Pritchard k Gatliff (Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., xii., 189, 1899). 



EuLiMA APHELES, Ten.-Woods. 



This species is indistinguishable from E. augur, except "base 

 marked with three or four equidistant spiral lines." 



EULIMA TeNISONI. 



The type of E. micans in the Hobart Museum represents a 

 species distinct from the shell figured by Tryon and attributed 

 by him to Woods' species. It has a shorter spire ending more 

 stoutly, the base flatter though not angulated, aperture relatively 

 larger and slightly more obliquely produced; it has resemblance 

 to E. fulvescens, A, Adams. 



Batillaria Diemenensis, Quoy & Gaimard [Ceritliium). 



A common littoral shell in Southern Australia, commonly 

 recognised as Turrifella cerifhium, Q. & G., accurately agrees 

 with the type specimen in the Paris Museum, though not recog- 

 nisable from the authors' figure. Ceritliium Diemenense of the 

 same authors is well figured and agrees with the young shell of 

 the forenamed species. Because Diemenense is the earlier name, 

 and because more faithfully pictorally represented, it is here pre- 

 ferentially employed. 



Triforis fasciata, Ten.-Woods. 



This species has been referred to T. scitula, A. Adams, imper- 

 fectly known; but as that species is stated to have only one series 

 of well-developed granules, whilst T. fasciata has three to five, 

 the attachment is not justified. 



Littorina Hisseyana, Ten.-Woods. 



Many examples of this shell have been received from Mr. 

 Legrand, named as above in the author's own handwriting; they 

 are the fry of Leiopyrga^ or at any rate belong to Trochidce, as 

 indicated by the pearly lustre and the thin horny multispiral 

 operculum. 

 31 



