BY THOMAS G. SLOAN E. 381 



I have compared my specimens of S. rimosicollis with the type 

 of S. angulicollis and found them the same. 



Ilab.—Q.: Kuranda (Dodd); Gayndah (Masters)— N. S.W.: 

 Dunoon (Helms); Illawarra (Carter). 



ScopoDES DENTicoLLis Macleay. 



Trans. Ent. Soc. N. S. Wales, i. 1864, p. 112; S. sex/oveatus 

 Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. Wales, (2), iii. 1888, p. 456. 



I have examined the types of ^. denticollis and S. foveatus in 

 the Macleay Museum, and could find no difference between them. 



ScoPODES LAEVis Macleay. 



Trans. Ent. Soc. N. S. Wales, ii. 1871, p.92. 



I have seen the type of S. laevis in the Australian Museum, 

 Sydney, and found it allied to S. denticollis, Macl. It has all 

 the features necessary to bring it into the same group as aS'. 

 denticollis according to the tabular view of the species I have 

 given in these Proceedings for 1893 (p.637). I also compared 

 with it S. sydneyensis SI., and considered them distinct. 



Genus Ectinochila. 



EcTiNOCHiLA aurata Macleay. 



Scopodes auratus Macleay, Trans. Ent. Soc. N.S.Wales, ii. 1871, 



p.92; Ectinochila tessellata Chaudoir, Col. Nov. 1883, i. p. 21; 



Scopodes Jasciolatus Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. Wales, 1887 



(2), ii. p.219. 



I have only recently been able to compare Chaudoir's descrip- 

 tion of Ectinochila tessellata with fresh specimens of Scopodes 

 auratus Macl., with the result that 1 feel no doubt as to their 

 identity. The types of Scopodes fasciolatus Macl., are in the 

 Macleay Museum, where are also specimens of Scopodes auratus 

 from Gayndah; a recent examination of these convinced me of 

 their identity. 



Hah. — Q.: Kuranda (Dodd); Gayndah (Masters); Coomera, 

 south of Brisbane (Sloane; under the bark of a dead sapling; 

 June, 1906). 

 28 



