BY A. J. TURNER. 645 



-5. Wings dark greenish \]. lipurota. 



Wings whitish 6. 



6. Cilia with basal dark fuscous dots 13. elaphrodes. 



Cilia without dark fuscous dots 14. dolichopis. 



7. Wings with fuscous and orange (or ferruginous) lines... S. 

 Wings without orange (or ferruginous) markings 9. 



8. Forewings with postmedian line showing an acute pro- 



jection above middle 15, ferrilinea. 



Postmedian line of forewings without acute projection.. 16. detima. 



■9. Wings pinkish- or reddish-tinged 10. 



Wings whitish without reddish tinge 12. 



10. Forewings with a whitish costal streak ... \'J. alhicostafa, 



Forewings without whitish costal streak 11. 



11. Wings with fuscous lines or dots 18. hahnaeata. 



Wrings without fuscous markings 19. i<cintillans. 



12. Wings with transverse lines pale ochreous 20. fitcosa. 



Wings with transverse lines fuscous or grey... 13. 



1 3. Forewings with a whitish costal streak 14. 



Forewings without costal streak 15. 



14. Forewings with costal edge reddish 21. prohleta. 



Forewings with costal edge not reddish 22. nephelota. 



15. Forewings with median line obsolete 23. pseliota. 



Forewings with median line distinct 16. 



16. Forewings with distinct discal dot 24. pachydetis. 



Forewings without discal dot 25. philocosma. 



Section i. Hind tibica of ^ more or less dilated and distorted 

 (Ptychopoda). 



9. EOIS COSTARIA. 



Acidalia costaria Wlk., Brit. Mus. Cat. xxvi. p. 16 10. 

 Acidalia isornorpha Meyr., Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.Wales, 1887, p.845. 

 Very similar to E. albicostata, but slightly larger, more pinkish, 

 with less purple-grey tinge. The fillet is fuscous, nearly as dark 

 as the face, and this is a good point of distinction from albicostata, 

 which has the fillet white or whitish. The males of the two 

 species are easily distinguished. Both have a wide range of dis- 

 tribution. Walker's type is a female, and without subjecting it 

 to critical examination I cannot of course be sure whether, as Sir 

 Geo. Hampson suggests, it actually is the same as isomorpha 

 Meyr., and not albicostata Wlk. 



