BY G. A. WATERHOUSE. 271 



EXPLANATION OF PLATES. 



Plate ii. 



Fig. I. — Eupyschellus dionislm, Boisd. 



Fig. 2. — Neojnthecops zalmora, Butl. 



Fig. 3.—Megisba nifira,M.isk. ^. 



Fig. 4.— ,, ,, „ $. 



Fig. 5. — Zizera delosj/da, n.sp. 



Fig, 6. — Arhojxila wildei, Misk. S" ■ 



Fig. 7.— „ ,, ,, ?• 



Fig, S.— Da nis (rpollonius, Felder $. 

 Fig. 9.-^Una matJiewi, Misk. <^. 

 Fig. 10.— Zizera alxulus, Herr.-Schff. 3" . 

 Fig. IL — Cyaniris tenella, Misk. J". 

 Fig. 12.— Pseudodipi^as fumidus, Misk. <^. 

 Fig. 1.3.— „ ,, ,, $• 



Fig. 14. — ,, eone, F elder S'. 



Fig. 15.— „ „ ,> ?• 



Fig. 16.— MZ^fn.s rovena, Druce $. 

 Fig. 17, — Candalidefi erinuH, Fabr. J^. 

 Fig. 18.— „ ,, ,, ?• 



Fig. 19. — ,, a casta, Cox 3. 



Fig. 20.— ,, Injaciathlna, Serm^er 3. 



Fig. 21. — Una sulpitius, Misk. J^. 

 Fig. 22. ~ Lucia pyrodiscus, Eosen. (^. 

 Fig. 23.— ,, „ ,, 2' 



Fig.2i.—Candalides alhosericea,Wi&k. 3"- 



Fig. 25.- „ ,, „ 2. 



Fig. 26. — Rapala simsoni, Misk. 3- 

 Fig. 27.— Hy poly ccena phorbas, Fabr. J'. 

 Fig. 28.— Pseuclo7iotis timieri, Waterhouse $ . . 

 Fig. 29.—I<ilmenus lithochroa, n.sp. J". 

 Fig. 30.— ,, inoH.^Uew. 3. 

 Fig. Sl.—Nacaduba lineata, Murray $ . 

 Fig. 32. — Arhopala eupolis, Misk. 3- 

 Fig. 33. — lalmenus evagoras, Don. J^. 

 Fig. M.—Candalides helenita, Semper $, 

 Fig. 35. —Bindahara Hiigriva, Horsf. 3- 

 Fig. 36.— „ „ ,, ?• 



NOTE-The No. of the top left-hand figure should be 1, not 11. In fig. 29 

 the spot above the dotted line is accidental, and should not have appeared. 



