I 



BY J. H. MAIDEN. 891 



13. E. elongata, Link, (Enuiii. Hort. Berol. ii. 30; DC. Prod, 

 iii. 222), "very doubtful" (Bentharn) is probably E. eximia, 

 Schauer. 



14. E. flexilis, Kegel, (Gartenll. 1858, 284). I have been 

 unable to see specimens. 



15. E. gigantea, Dehnh. (op. cit. p. 20) is E. globulus, Labill. 



16. E. glandulosa, Desf. (Cat. Hort. Par. Ed. iii. 408) is E. 

 amygdalina, Labill. 



17. E. glaucophi/lla, Hoffmgg. (Verz. Pfl. Nachtr. ii. 113). 



18. E. glohularis, Hort. (ex DC. Prod. iii. 219) is E. amygda- 

 lina, Labill. 



19. E. hypericifolia, Dum-Cours. ( Bot. Cult. Ed. ii. vii. 279). 



20. E. hypericifolia. Link, (Bot. Cult. Ed. ii. vii. 279) is E. 

 cneorifolia, DC. (? same as 19). 



21. E. Lindleyana, DC. (Prod. iii. 219) is E. amygdalina, 

 Labill. 



22. E. linearis, Dehnh. (op. cit. p. 20), is probably a valid 

 species. 



23. E. longifolia, Lindl. (Bot. Reg. t. 947; Spreng. Cur. Post. 

 195) is E. amygdalina, Labill. 



24. E. media. Link, " Jardin de Berlin, M. Otto, 1826" (DC. 

 Prod. iii. 222). 



25. E. mncronata. Link, (Enum. Hort. Berol. ii. 30) is E. ovata, 

 DC. (Prod. iii. 218). 



26. E. rayrtifolia, Link, " Jardin de Berlin, M. Otto, 1826" 

 (DC. Prod. iii. 222). 



27. E. oppositifolia, Desf. (Tabl. Ed. i. 222) is E. corymhosa, 

 Sm., according to a specimen, in leaf only, in Herb. Mus. Paris 

 from the Jardin Noisette, 1812, presented by M. Bonpland in 

 1833. 



A second specimen in the same herbarium, presented by M. 

 Bonpland in 1833 and labelled in very old hand-writing '^ opositi- 

 folius" (sic) is indeterminable. 



28. E. oppositifolia. Noisette. A specimen from Herb. Paris, 

 is E. tereticornis, Sm. 



