BY J. H. MAIDEN. 895 



4. E. argentea, (I) Covdiev. Copy of label in Herb. Mus. Paris: 

 " Eucah/ptus argentea. Cultive par Mons. Cordier, Maison 



Oarrt^e pres Alger, 1 Avril, 1876, Durandoz" C?). 



M. Naiulin has written on this label, " Je ne trouve aucun E. 

 argentea decrit dans les auteurs." It is E. inelliodora, A. Cunn. 



5. E. citryandra, (?) Vilmorin, is E. cocci/era, Hook.f. I have 

 referred to this plant in Report Aust. Assoc. Adv. Science, 

 Hobart Meeting, 1902, Vol. ix., p. 365. 



6. E. ccerulescens, Naudin, 2nd Mem. p. 47. A label in Herb. 

 Mus. Paris reads : — Eucalyptus coirulescens, Naudin, du Bois du 

 Boulogne d' Alger, Fevrier 1883. Type. Ech. fructifere venant 

 de la Villa Thuret (Alpes Mar.)." In flower and fruit. 



A second label reads ^'■Eucalyptus coprulescefis Ndn. Villa 

 Thuret, Nov. 1889. Ch. Ndn." In bud only. They are referable 

 to E. melllodora, A. Cunn. 



I have received similar specimens from MM. Vilmorin, Andrieux 

 k Cie. M. Naudin (2nd Mem.) recognised the affinity of this 

 plant to E. melliodora, but he distinguishes E. cceridescens by the 

 shorter leaves, "and perhaps better by its general glaucescence." 

 I ma}^ point out that E. meHiodora is often glaucous. 



7. E. cultrlfolia, Naudin, 2nd Mem., p. 64. (I have seen this 

 species referred to as cultriformis, Naudin). Copy of a label in 

 Herb. Mus. Paris in Naudin's handwriting : — ''Eucalyptus cuhri- 

 foHa, Ndn. Jardin Nabonnand au Golfe Juan, Ch. Ndn." This 

 is E. eugenioides, Sieb., a little altered under cultivation. 



Another specimen in the same herbarium bearing the label 

 " Eucalyptus not described which flowered in my garden last 

 year, very few plants of it in this country, none of. them flowered 

 but with me " (in Lambert's handwriting), and the further label 

 "Herb. Mus. Paris. Herbier donne par Mr. Bonpland en 1833. 

 Cult, e horto Lamberto," to which is added, by M. Naudin, 

 "parait etre 1'^. CKltrifolia, Ndn," is also E. eugemoides, Sieb. 



"Esptce nouvelle, du moins tres probablement " (Naudin). 



It seems to me, from examination of a large number of culti- 

 Tated specimens which I have referred to E. eugenioides, Sieb., 



