JAMES A. G. REHN AND MORGAN HEBARD 289 



Columbia, South Carolina, VII, 28, 1913, (R. & H.), 1 9 . 



Sand Mountain, Georgia, VII, 9, 1905 and VIII, 25, 1903 (Morse), 

 3 cf , 3 9, [Morse Cln.]. 



Jasper, Georgia, VIII, 5, 1913, (R.), 1 d" n. 



Marietta, Georgia, VII, 27, 1903, (Morse), 2 d", [Morse Cln.]. 



Currahee Mountain, Georgia, VIII, 5, 1913, (H.; scarce in lu.xuriant 

 mountain vegetation), 3 9 . 



Vicinity of Stone Mountain, Georgia, VIII, 3, 1913, (R. & H.; under- 

 growth in pine woods), 1 c^, 1 9 . 



Warm Springs, Georgia, VIII, 9 to 10, 1913, (R.; scarce in luxuriant 

 vegetation), 2 9 . 



Macon, Georgia, VII, 30 to 31, 1913, (R. & H.; undergrowth in short- 

 leaf pine woods), 2 9 . 



Valley Head, Alabama, VII, 11, 1905, (Morse), 1 9, [Morse Cln.]. 



Mena, Arkansas, VII, 30 and 31, 1905, (:Morse), 3 cr', 3 9 , [Morse Cln.]. 



Eagleton, Arkansas, VIII, 3, 1905, (Morse), 3 d', 4 9, [Morse Cln.]. 



Howe, Oklahoma, VIII, 4, 1905, (Morse), 1 9, [Morse Cln.]. 



Haileyville, Oklahoma, VIII, 6, 1905, (Morse), 1 9, [Morse Cln.]. 



South McAlester, Oklahoma, VIII, 7, 1905, (Morse), 2 d", \ 9, [Morse 

 Cln.]. 



Dallas, Texas, (Boll), 1 d, [Hebard Cln.]. 



Bonita, Texas, VIII, 14, 1905, (:Morse), 1 9, [Morse Cln.]. 



Doucette, Texas, VII, 24, 1912, (H.), 2 d^, 1 9 . 



Scudderia strigata Scudder (PI. IX, figs. 6 and 13; pi. X, fig. 18.) 



1898. Scudderia laticauda form strigata Scudder, Proc. Am. Acad. 

 Arts and Sci., xxxiii, p. 280, fig. 4. [Jacksonville, Florida.] 



In describing S. laticauda, wliich is the soutlieni geographic 

 race of S. curvicauda, Brunner has certainly emphasized much 

 too strongly the slightly more rounded lateral angles of the pro- 

 notum which are found in this race, and has given this character 

 a prominent position in his key. Following this character only, 

 Scudder determined the pair of specimens at present under consid- 

 eration as laticauda (for these have very broadly rounded lateral 

 angles of the pronotum), ignoring the other striking differences 

 which exist between them and any other species of the genus. 

 He, however, gave for the present specimens the name strigata 

 to designate what appeared to him to be a mere color variety of 

 laticauda, and briefly described the more prominent differences in 

 coloration. As these two specimens represent an otherwise un- 

 known and very distinctive species, showing nearest affinitj' to 

 S. curvicauda, the name strigata must be used for this species. 



The characters of distinctive differentiation are the very narrow 



TRANS. AM. ENT. SOC, XL. 



