17 



The method of its use is as follows: given a bird in the hand of un- 

 known species to determine its name. It is first compared with the first 

 heading in small capitals numbered in Roman numerals — i, feet fully 

 WEBBED. If this description does not fit the bird, the next Roman 

 numeral heading is referred to — ii, feet partly webbed, or iii, feet 

 WITHOUT pronounced WEB. Assuming that the latter correctly describes 

 the bird under discussion, we refer to the headings of next lower rank, 

 which are numbered alphabetically with capital letters, where we find 

 the alternatives — F, Legs long, and G, Legs short. Sometimes it may be 

 difficult to decide whether a leg should be regarded as long or short, and 

 the various pictured details following may then assist determination. In 

 this case the legs we decide are not remarkably long, no longer in comparison 

 to size of the bird than are the legs of a chicken or sparrow; we, therefore, 

 under G, refer to a number of subordinate alternatives, distinguished by 

 small initial letters — k, feet chicken-like, strong and compact for scratch- 

 ing; 1, feet strongly clawed for holding prey; m, feet small and weak; 

 n, feet small or medium-sized, solidly made and legs covered with horny 

 scales or plates. Glances at various feet shown under each heading will 

 assist in determination. Assuming a decision in favour of the last, we 

 compare our specimen with the next alternatives, numbered with ordinary 

 Arabic numerals — 19, two toes in front; 20, three toes in front. There 

 can be Httle confusion here and we assume that our specimen having three 

 front toes is one of the great body of perching birds. We, therefore, 

 compare it with the following Une detail drawings to see with which it 

 agrees most closely. The bill is not wide and flat; it is, therefore, not a 

 flycatcher; there are no ear-tufts or long hind toe and the nostril is not 

 covered with feather tufts, therefore it cannot be either a Horned Lark, 

 a Crow, or a Jay. The next picture, the Bobolink's bill, catches our eye 

 and the sparrow bill in the next lot. A glance through the remainder 

 shows that our bird must be a bobolink or one of the sparrows. The picture 

 p. 247, and description of the former, is nothing like it; therefore, we turn 

 to the sparrows, read the general sparrow description, and remarks on p. 181, 

 and then work through the pictures. After looking at all the illustrations 

 we find that our specimen agrees with that of the Song Sparrow, and on 

 reading over the distinctive characters we have our opinion confirmed. 

 It has the sharply striped breast aggregated in the centre, and is without 

 either the yellow stripe over the eye of the Savannah Sparrow or the 

 white outer feathers of the tail, as in the Vesper. We are, therefore, 

 confident that, starting with no other ornithological knowledge than that 

 the specimen was an Eastern Canadian bird, we have been able to refer it 

 to its proper species. 



