﻿62 



publications of the Earthquake Investigation Committee of Tokyo, No. 16, p. 99, Mr. A. Imamura 

 analyses this earthquake on the assumption that its origin was probably near Manila, where it is said to 

 have been registered at 9 21 -2. This, however, does not correspond with the entry in the 'Bulletin of the 

 Philippine Weather Bureau,' November 1902, p. 281. 



The recorded amplitudes and the values for M for Perth, Batavia, and Tokyo indicate an origin near 

 to the centre of a circle which would pass through these three stations, or 160° E. Long, and 0° N. or S. 

 Lat. The values M - C f or these three stations suggest an origin near New Guinea, while the values of 

 M together with that for Irkutsk place the origin about 1 30° E. Long. All that we can say about the 

 origin is that it appears to be in the eastern portion of district F. 



59. November 18. 



Antipodean disturbance. 



59&. November 19. 



November 20. Instrument not working. 



60. November 21. 



In the publication of the Earthquake Investigation Committee of Tokyo, No, 16, p. 100, Mr. Imamura 

 says that this earthquake originated off the southern coast of Formosa, and that in Manila the initial 

 movement was registered at 7h. 1 -Sm. This hour, it will be observed, is not in accord with the one just 

 given, wliich was obtained from 'The Bulletin of the Philippine Weather Bureau,' November, 1902, 



