i8o Hopewell Mound Group 



Moore, C. B., i. As to Copper from Certain Mounds of the St. Johns 

 River, Florida, 1894, Vol. 1, pp. 30-31; Vol. II, p. 224. 



2. Sheet-Copper from the Mounds is not Necessarily of European 

 Origin. With Discussion by J. D. McGuire, F. W. Putnam, and 

 George A. Dorsey. American Anthropologist (n.s.), Vol. V, 

 1903, p. 27. 



Moorehead, W. K., i. New Relics of Mound Builders. Illustrated 

 American, Vol. IX, 1892, pp. 509-512. 



2. Primitive Man in Ohio, 1892. Chapter XV, pp. 184-197; 

 Chapter XVI, pp. 204-241. 



3. Recent Archaeological Discoveries in Ohio. Scientific American 

 Supplement, Vol. XXXIV, August 27, 1892, pp. 13886-13890. 



4. Recent Discoveries among the Mound Builders. California 

 Illustrated Magazine, 1893, pp. 471-483. 



5. Ohio Mounds, 1893, pp. 1-7, 10-21. Pamphlet distributed at 

 the World's Columbian Exposition, Chicago. 



6. Synopsis of Archaeological Work in Ross County, Ohio, 1893 

 (6 pages). 



7. Sculptures from Southern Ohio Mounds. Archaeologist, Vol. I. 

 1893, pp. 208-213. 



8. Comparison between Harness Mound and Hopewell Effigy, 

 Report of the Ohio Historical and Archaeological Society, cover- 

 ing field work of 1896, Vol. VI, Sec. 4, pp. 308-330. 



9. The Hopewell Find. American Antiquarian, Vol. XVIII, 

 1896, p. 58. 



10. The Hopewell Group. The Antiquarian, Vol. I, 1897, p. 208. 



ii. Are the Hopewell Copper Objects Prehistoric? American 

 Anthropologist (n.s.), Vol. V, 1903, p. 50. Also reprinted in the 

 Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly, Vol. XII, p. 317. 



12. A Study of Primitive Culture in Ohio. Putnam Anniversary 

 Volume (New York, 1909), pp. 137-150. 



13. The Stone Age in North America (Boston, 19 10), Vol. I, pp. 140, 

 218, 373; Vol. II, pp. 122, 233. 



14. Stone Ornaments of the American Indian (1917), pp. 234, 251, 

 382,387, 417. 



