BY THE REV. J. E. TENISON-WOODS, F.G.S., F.L.S. 137 



Burragood, and the Ichthyodorulite Range. Dr. Feistrnantel's 

 examples came from the strata of Smith's Creek, near - Stroud and 

 the Rouchel River. 



Amongst the numerous examples found in the Drummond 

 Range, there are many compressed branches which have formerly 

 been cylindrical, and instead of having the lozenge-shaped depressed 

 leaf-scars with a raised margin, are marked with impressions of 

 distant narrow-pointed leaf -like scales. They exactly correspond 

 with the figure given by Feistmantel in the above work, at plate 23, 

 figs 2 and 3, and which are lettered Knorriastadium (1) and Le}ndo- 

 dendron veltheimianum (?), the doubtful note in both cases being 

 that of Dr. F. They came from Smith's Creek, New South Wales. 

 I think there can be but little doubt, from the mode in which they 

 are associated, that they belong to the same plant. There are also 

 smaller stems, of which I figure one example which seems to me 

 like the internal casts of the smaller branchlets. The surface is 

 covered with raised cushions, which are closely quincuncial. The 

 cushions rise gradually towards the apex, and have an imbricated 

 appearance. In the larger examples the cushions are longer and 

 very much narrowed. I think we have in these, internal casts of 

 the branches. If we suppose the external scars to be raised in 

 such a way as to give rise to a corresponding depression in the 

 internal cylinder, then the casts would present the appearance 

 noticed above. Moreover, they are ill-defined, and without any 

 leaf impressions, just as internal depressions would be. The stone 

 is quite fine enough to retain the most delicate marks where they 

 exist. The shape of these casts also confirms this explanation, for 

 they are always more or less cylindrical, or the casts of cylinders 

 which have been compressed. Whenever the exterior of the 

 branches is exhibited, it is on the surface of concave casts. 



Cyclostigma. Haughton. 



The plants thus distinguished were first brought to the notice 

 of science by Dr. Haughton, in a paper published in the Annals 

 of Nat. History for 1860 (3rd ser.. vol. v., p. 444), entitled 



