694 



Regeneration 



been done on many of the other glands is 

 a case in point. These problems are more 

 difficult technically than the relatively sim- 

 ple ones so far studied, biit with care and 

 patience they should yield much in the 

 next decade. 



It is evident that regeneration is a com- 

 plex primarily depending upon the two 

 cardinal things peculiar to tissues: differen- 

 tiation, and proliferation resulting in growth. 

 The determination of these tissues is usually 

 and generally uniformly controlled by po- 

 sition in the total organism. The potential- 

 ity of a cell, whether embryonic or blas- 

 temal, to differentiate into either a structure 

 harmonious to its region or the replacement 

 of such, is the residtant of many factors such 

 as the compatibility of the tissues, the re- 

 lationship of the proliferating parts, and the 

 interplay of growth inhibitors and regula- 

 tors. The solution of this complex still re- 

 mains to engage ovir study and attention. 



REFERENCES 



Aval, M., and Verrier, M. L. 1930 Un cas de re- 

 generation hypotypique de la patte chez Lacerta 

 vivipara. Bull. Biol. France et Belg., <?^.- 1 98-204. 



Barber, L. W. 1944 Correlations between wound 

 healing and regeneration in forelimbs and tails of 

 lizards. Anat. Rec, 55'.-441-453. 



Barbour, T., and Stetson, H. C. 1929. The squa- 

 mation of Homoeosaurus. Bull. Mus. Comp. 

 Zool., 69:m-\M. 



Barfurth, D. 1891 Zur Regeneration der Gewebe. 

 Arch. mikr. Anat., 37.-406-491. 



1895 Die experimentelle Regeneration 



iiberschiissiger Gliedmassentheile bei den Am- 

 phibien. Roux' Arch. Entw.-mech., l:9\-\\6. 



1 899 Eine Larve von Petromyzon planeri 



mit drei Schwanzspitzen. Roux' Arch. Entw.- 

 mech., 9.-27-31. 



Bateson, W. 1894 Materials for the Study of 

 Variation. Macmillan and Co., London. 



Beckwith, C. J. 1927 The effect of the extirpa- 

 tion of the lens rudiment on the development of 

 the eye in Amblystoma punctatum. with special 

 reference to the choroid fissure. J. Exp. Zool., 29: 

 217-260. 



Beigel. C. 1910 Zur Regeneration des Kiem en- 

 deckels und der Flossen der Teleostier. Bull, in- 

 ternat. d.l'Acad. d. Cracovie, Ser. B., Sci. Nat., 

 July, i9i0:655-690. 



1912 Regeneration der Barteln bei Silu- 



roiden. Roux' Arch. Entw.-mech., 3'^.-363-370. 



Biberhofer, R. 1906 Vsher Regeneration bei Am- 

 phioxus lanceolatus. Roux' Arch. Entw.-mech., 

 22.- 15-1 7. 



Bischler, V. 1926 L'influence du squelette dans 

 la regeneration, et les potentialites des divers ter- 

 ritoires du membre chez Triton cristatus. Rev. 

 Suisse Zool., 33.-431-560. 



Bishop, G. H. 1945 Regeneration after experi- 

 mental removal of skin in man. Am. J. Anat., 76: 

 153-182. 



Bohmel, W. 1929 Regeneration nach Entnahme 

 von Skeletteilen beim Axolotl. Roux' Arch. Entw.- 

 mech., .fi5.-464-509. 



Boulenger, G. A. 1888 On the scaling of the re- 

 produced tail in lizards. Proc. Zool. Soc, London, 

 iS88:351-353. 



Bovet, D. 1930 Les territoires de regeneration; 

 leurs proprietes etudiees par la methode de 

 deviation du nerf. Rev. Suisse Zool., 37.-83-145. 



Brachet, J. 1946 Localisation de la phosphatase 

 alcaline pendant le developpement des Batraciens. 

 Experientia, 2.- 143. 



Braus, J. 1909 Gliedmassenpfropfung und 

 Grundfragen der Skelettbildung. I. Die Skelettan- 

 lage vor Auftreten des Vorknorpels und ihre 

 Beziehung zu spateren Differenzierungen. 

 Morph. Jahr., 39.-284-430. 



Broussonet, M. 1786 Observations sur la regen- 

 eration de quelques parties du corps des Pois- 

 sons. Hist. I'Acad. Roy. des Science (de Paris), 

 Amsterdam. /7(9^.-684^688. 



Burr, H. S. 1916 The effects of the removal of 

 the nasal pits in Amblystoma embryos. J. Exp. 

 Zool., 20:27-57. 



Butler, E. G. 1933 The effects of X-radiation on 

 the I'egeneration of the forelimb of Amblystoma 

 larvae. J. Exp. Zool, ^5.-271-315. 



1935 Studies on limb regeneration in X- 



rayed Amblystoma larvae. Anat. Rec, 62:295- 

 307. 



Byrnes. E. F. 1904 Regeneration of the anterior 

 limbs in the tadpoles of frogs. Roux' Arch. Entw.- 

 mech., 18:171-\77. 



Colucci, V. S. 1891 Sulla regenerazione parziale 

 deir occhio nei Tritoni. Istogenesi e sviluppo. 

 Mem. della R. Acad. Sc. 1st Bologna, Ser. 5, i: 

 593-629. 



Cu\^er, G. 1829 The Animal Kingdom. Vol. 2. 

 G. B. Whittaker, London. 



Duncker, G. 1905 Uber Regeneration des 

 Schwanzendes bei Syngnathiden. Roux' Arch. 

 Entw.-mech.. 2C.-30-37. 



1907 Uber Regeneration des Schwanzen- 

 des bei Syngnathiden. Roux' Arch. Entw.-mech.. 

 2'^.-656-662. 



Egger, E. 1888 Ein Fall von Regeneration einer 



Extremitat bei Reptilien. Arbeiten zool.-zootom. 



Inst. Wiirzburg, ^.•201-212. 

 Emery, C. 1897 Wer hat die Regeneration der 



Augenlinse aus dem Irisepithel zuerst erkannt 



und dargestellt? Anat. Anz., ^3.63-64. 

 Fischel, A. 1900 Ueber die Regeneration der 



Linse. Anat. Hefte, y^.- 1-256. 

 Flint, J. M. 1910 Compensatory hypertrophy of 



the small intestine following resection of large 



portions of the jejunum and ileum. Trans. Conn. 



State Med. Soc, 1910:283-355. 

 Forsyth, J. W. 1946 The histology of anuran 



limb regeneration. J. Morph., 75'.-287-322. 

 Fraisse, P. 1885 Die Regeneration von Geweben 



und Organen bei Wirbeltieren. Cassel, Berlin. 

 Fritsch, C. 1911 Experimentelle Studien iiber 



