Stoll.] 260 [Feb, 6, 



not form a dipthong ay, as one would believe from the old or- 

 thography. So read 



mebai instead of mebay, 



ahtzeolai ahtzeolay. 



ahpitzolai ahpitzolay, 



tzatchi vinak read tzatzi vinak. 



p. 22. aqiial, aqiiala, child, written, according to the old 

 Spanish orthography, for acual^ acuala. Many Indians pro- 

 nounce a^ual, a^uald. 

 p. 23. zah read zak white. 



coman gaman, or zaman the cornfield. 



camah ^amah or zamah to work. 



chu^huh ^hu^huJi, ^hu^huhilah. 

 gix, gixalah thorn, thorny, read ^ix ^ixalah. 

 ^ eeJielah ticon, a cacao-field neglected and overgrown ; 

 most probably an error of the copyist for ^ichelah t. 

 qui (^ul) is the " manta," the unworked cotton-cloth. 

 £u is the " chamarra," a sort of woolen blanket used by 

 the Indians. 

 p. 24. hai read hay, because here the i forms part of a diph- 

 thong ay. 

 nu uh, nil uhil, write and pronounce nu vuh, nu vuhil 

 my book. If the root were simply uh, its combina- 

 tion with the possessive pronoun would be v-uh, 

 and not 7iu i(h. 

 zac, zacil is the orthography adopted for the pui'e 

 Maj^a idiom. It corresponds with the Cakchiquel 

 zak, zakil (also gak, gakil'). 

 p. 25. chu vih "against me," v-ih means " my back," chu vih 

 at my back, behind me. And so cha vih, behind 

 thee (not chahvih). 

 p. 26. chinubilvih. Flores gives the same combination (p. 

 25ft) with the variant chiruhilvih, within himself. 

 He adds another one of the same meaning, formed 

 with cohol, the space or distance between two things, 

 viz.: chinu cohol within myself. 



cha cohol within thyself. 

 chu cohol. 

 chika cohol. 



