No. 3.] 



MINOR PLANETS— LEUSCHNER, GLANCY, LEVY. 



155 



COMPARISON OF TABLES. 



Table LVI. — Unless there are errors of caloulation, all the discrepancies are due to the 

 acciomulation of other discrepancies already discussed. Without going into the details of the 

 construction, it is suflicient to remark that our table is built from practically all of the available 

 auxiliary material. Our table includes many more terms than v. Zeipel's table, but it is wanting 

 in the two arguments (>r and Sf in the first block of terms. These arguments contain 3e and 4£, 

 respectively, and our series were not inclusive of these higher multiples. It would be more 

 consistent to include them, since the argument IF is included. 



Table LVII. — Unless there are errors of calcxilation, all the discrepancies are due to the 

 accumulation of discrepancies already discussed. Om- table is built from practically aU the 

 available auxiliary material. Large disagreements are to be exjjlained by v. Zeipel's use 

 of the formula following Z 131, equation (244). In this equation the following functions are 

 omitted : 



-J(!// cos ^+2,' sin 0)-H[?/2] cos ip + [z-i] sin <fi). 



ERRATA' IN H. v. ZEIPEL, ANGENAHERTE JUPITERSTORUNGEN Ft)R DIE HECDBA-GRUPPE. 



With the exception of § 6, Storungen des Radius-vector, all tlie developments have been checked. 



' Inclusive of those tabulated bvv. Zcipel. . ^ . .». v ■- 



« The number of the lino counting from the top of the paEO is indicated by a, countmg from the bottom of the page by D. 



• On page 3 and all following pages ►' is defined by '-'- i-- The error consists in the omission of a statement announcing a change of notation. 



See definition of y' given on page 2. 



