A REVISED LIST OF CORALLINE. 7 



chose to mention tliem separately. Madam Weber van Bosse 

 is of tlie same ojiinion as Harvey ; and this view I think pre- 

 ferable. Amp. Cumingii Rupr. and Amp. Karstalskii Rupr. have 

 been challenged by Areschoucj, who thought that they have 

 close affinity with Amp. exilis Harv. Madam Weber van 

 Bosse has kindly Avritten me after examination of authentic 

 specimens that Ruprecht's plants are identical with Amp. anceps. 

 This disposal of Ruprecht's species is entirely on her own 

 authority. 



Areschoug doubtingiy referred Amp. Beauvoisii, Amp. 

 pustulata and Amp. complanata to Amp. exi/is Harv. Madam 

 Weber made it clear that Harvey's plant was similar to Amp. 

 Beauvoisii Lamx. The other doubtful species described by Kütz- 

 I^'G are so insufficiently defined that I can not find their exact 

 relation to other plants ; nor are they sharply enough defined to 

 be reckoned as independent species. Madam Weber remarks 

 that she saw in Kutzing's herbarium a plant called Amp. linearis 

 KüTZ. which she thinks a stunted form of Amp. ephedrœa Lamx. 

 She does not mention anything about the connection between the 

 specimen and the illustration in Kutzing's Tab. Phyc. VIII. 

 Tab. 46. Amp. caiialiculata Yendo is a doubtful plant, as has 

 been already mentioned. ^^ It is probably a broad form of Amp. 

 anceps. The scarcity of the specimen precludes me from further 

 discussion. 



Se:t. HI. ARTHROCARDÏA Dcne. p. p. Memoir, p. 112. 



= Arthroeardia Aeesch. p. p. in J. Ag. Spec. Alg. II. p. 547. 

 = Pseudarthrocardia Yendo. Eimmer. Cor. Alg. p. 191. 

 Amphiroa corymbosa Dcne. Memoir, p. 112. 



1) Enumeration of Coral. Alg. p. 190. 



