246 



126. M. Oblonga,* Swains., Zool. 111. 2tl scr. i, pi. 44, f. 1, 



{Volutella) 1829. 

 Sowb., Thes. Conch, i, 398, pi. 76, f. 106, 107, 1846. 

 M. cajmea (not Storer) Sowb. in pai't. Thes. Conch, i, 398, pi. 



76, f. 102, 114 (not 103), 1846. 

 M. amahilis, Redf., Ann. N. Y. Lye. Nat. Hist, v, 225, 1852. 

 M. ohlonga, Reeve, Conch. Icon. Marginella pi. 12, f. 51, a, b, 



1864. Bahamas aiid Yucatan. 



127. M. obscura, Reeve, Conch. Icon. Marginella pi. 24, f. 



132, 1865. Hah. miknoicn. 



128. M. Obtusa, Sowb., Thes. Conch, i, 374, pi. 74, f. 11, 12, 



1846. Hah. unhioton, but of a West African type. 



129. M, Odoricyi, Bernardi, Journ. de Conch, iii, 59, pi. 2, 



f. 6, 7, 1852. Hah. unknoivn. 



Jl30. M. olivseformis, Kiener, Coq. Viv. p. 12, pi. 8, f. 36, 

 1834. 

 Desh., ed. Lam. Anim. sans Vert, x, 449, 1844. Sowb., 

 Thes. Conch, i, 392, pi. 77, f. 163, 164, 1846. Reeve, 

 Conch. Icon. Marginella pi. 6, f. 19, a, b, 1864. 



Senegal, 



131. M. olivella, Reeve, Conch. Icon. Marginella pi. 25, f. 



140, a, b, 1865. Australia. 



M. ONYCHIXA, Ad. and Reeve, is 31. Bernardii, Larg. 



132. M. ornata, Redf. Here proposed for 



M. vittata,i Reeve, (not Edwards) Conch. Icon. Marginella 

 pi. 5, f. 17, a, b, c, d, 1864. Hast Africa. 



133. M. oryza, (Lam.) 



f Stipon, Adanson, Senegal, p. 79, pi. 5, f. 4, 1757. 



Vohita monilis, var. j3, Gmelin, ed. Syst. Nat. p. 3444, 1788. 



Encyc, Meth. Vers. pi. 374, f. 6, a, b, 1798. 

 Voluta miliaria^ (syn. excl.) Dillw., Descr. Cat. p. 524, 1817. 



* Among the varied forms usually referred to this species, three are 

 prominent: 1st, one which may be regarded as the type, and which an- 

 swers well to Swainson's somewhat magnified figure ; this is sometimes 

 flecked a little with white, after the manner of M. guttata, Dillw. 2d, 

 the shell which 1 have formerly discriminated as M. amahilis, represented 

 by figs. 102 and 114 of Sowerby's Thesaurus, and mistaken by him for 

 M. carnea. 3d, a form more attenuated anteriorly, figured by Sowerby 

 (Thes. f. 106, 107) as the type. Reeve's figure approaches the first of these 

 forms. I much incline to regard the three as distinct species. If so con- 

 sidered, the third might take the name of 31. rostrata. M. carnea (Thes. 

 f. 103) is certainly distinct from either of the above. 



t Preoccupied by Edwards in 1852 for a fossil species. 



