JUKASSIC FOSSILS FR03I JUKUZEN. 



2. Belemnopsis s[). 



3. Belemnojysis sp. 



4. Belemnites sp. 



1. Amiiwnlieti sp. 



9 



From Bed V. 



Animoniiea sp. 

 3. Beleiiinites 8 p. 



From Bed Y I. 



1. Harpoceruii Ikianinn n, sp. 



2. Schlothehnia Jimboi n. sp. 



3. Lytoceras ef. Uneatii/in Schloth. 



Jiidgiiig from tliese fossils, there is not tlie least doubt about 

 Bed VI being of a Liassic age. It is of course not possible at 

 23resent to determine exactly to ^vllat part of the Lias it Ijelongs. 

 But as Schlotheimia is a genus hitherto confined to the Lower 

 Lias and Lytoceras lineatum is a species only found in the Middle 

 Lias, so it is most probable that the bed represents the lower 

 half of the Lias, and it is also not altogether impossible that it 

 is again divisible into two parts, the lower or Schlotheimia-hQ'àvmg 

 bed and the upper or Lytoc&ras-hQ'AYiiv^ bed. 



Bed Y is also probably Liassic, as the two Ammonites con- 

 tained in it look very nnich like those of Arietinœ. By Professor 

 JiMBO they have even been taken for Arlel'Ues. If such be really 

 the case, then the bed must be assigned to the Upper Lias. 



Bed I Y is a very important one, as it contains Trigonia 

 V-codata Lycett, a species hitherto found onh^ in the Inferior 

 Oolite of England. ^Vnd as a Belemnojms which occurs together 

 with it has never been found outside of the Dogger, so we may 

 fairly assume that the bed represents the lower half of the 

 Doggei-, roughly corresponding to the Inferior Oolite of England. 



