Mas;uetic Soparatiüns of Iron Lines in Différent Fields. 



23 



//. OtJur less Stro)uj Lines. 



/ 5615*661 is separated into a sharp triplet. 



Table XIX. 



Comparison with tbriiier results. 



H 



A>. 



X104 



1-130 

 1-170 

 1-161 

 1-052 



King's value of the specific separation is a little larger than 

 tile writer's, Graftdijk' s being still larger: the discrepancy maj^ 

 be due to the difference of the magnetic i\Q\à applied. If so, the 

 curve in Fig. lU must turn upwards, but, so far as my experiment 

 goes, the separation is proportional to the magnetic field as shown 

 in Table XVIII and Fig. 10. The a1)0ve discrepancy is probably 

 due to expei'i mental errors. 



/ 5586*772 appears as a diffuse triplet. 



