THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST. 271 



Eupiihecia minoraia. — Type libel iii Taylor's handwriting attached ; 

 there is no locaHty libel but the round dite label "22 4.05"; characteris- 

 tic of material from Kaslo, B.C. sent out by Mr. Cockle, is affixed to the 

 specimen. 



Eupit/iecia packardata. — I'yP^ label in Taylor's handwriting on speci- 

 men labt-l!ed "Ottawa, Can., 7, VI IE, iqo6., C. H. Young". The series 

 contains 5 other specimens ; 2 from Montreal (A. F. Winn) ; i from 

 Trenton (Evans) ; i from Catskill Mt?;.; and i without locality label. 



Eupit/iecia grata. — Type label in Taylor's hand on specimen labelled 

 "Ottawa, Can., 5 VI. 1906, C H. Young". 



Eupit/iecia lagganata. — i cf i'l h^if condition only, labelled type 

 in Taylor's hand; locality "Laggan, Alta. (Dod)". 



Eupit/iecia comp aetata. — The single 9 type with label in Taylor's 

 hand; locality "Windermere, Upper Columbia River, B. C, (Dod) 13 

 VII. 07". 



Eupit/iecia spaUingi. — The specimen Libelle J type in Taylor's 

 hand is very poor and almost unrecognizibie. We doubt if the median 

 band mentioned in the original deFcription will appear so prominently in 

 fresh specimens. The locality label is "Stockton, Ut. (Spalding), IX., 

 2, 03". 



Eupit/iecia dyarata. — A hand printed type label wa.s present but not 

 attached to any specimen. The original description specifies as type a 9 

 from Kaslo (Cockle) dated "24 IV. 06." A specimen without abdomen 

 but apparently a 9 is contained in the series and labelled "J. W. Cockle, 

 24 IV. 02." This agrees well with the original description and also with 

 topotypes received from Mr. Cockle ; we imagine that the "06" is there- 

 fore either a printer's error or an oversight and have placed the label on 

 this specimen. 



Eupit/iecia scelestata. — This species was described from four speci- 

 mens labelled Kaslo, B. C, and dat^ed respectively 21st April, 2nd and 

 3rd May, r903 and 4th May 1905. All these specimens are in the series 

 but only the specimen dated 2nd May, 1903, which, by the way, is the 

 poorest specimen of the lot, bears a type label. We have affixed cotype 

 labels to the other three specimens. 



Eupit/iecia winnata. — A 9 in rather poor condition has a type label 

 in Taylor's handwriting. There should be two cotypes in Mr. Winn's 

 collection. 



