138 



26. No ocular spots. Céphalothorax minutelj' gra- 



nular. 

 27. Hand of the palps is IS broader than tibia and 



12 longer than fingers, which bear accessor}' 



teeth (19) nodosus Schranck. 



27. Hand of the palps is 15 broader than tibia and 



longer than fingers (20) megasoma Dad. 



26. Distinct ocular spots. Céphalothorax almost 



smooth. Hand l? longer than finger . (24) 7'/iore///7 Balz. 

 25. Two distinct transverse lines. Fingers (c?) gape 



distinctly when closed. Distinct ocular spots. 

 Céphalothorax minutely granular. 

 28. The hand of the palps is 15 longer than the 



finger; the trochanter with dorsal conical 

 tubercle. Upper side of the tibia in the male 



with a conical protuberance (21) nodiiliinanus Tom. 



28. The hand of the palps scarcely longer than the 



finger; the trochanter without dorsal conical 

 tubercle. Upper side of the tibia in the male 



without conical protuberance (22) cocophiliis Sim. 



24. The "tactile" hair of tarsus IV is basal. Sexual 



area (c?) of " Birmaniciis" type. 

 29. Céphalothorax with transverse stripe. 



30. Median transverse stripe is almost straight. 

 Distinct ocular spots. Smooth palps have tro- 

 chanter bigibbose and hand 17 longer than 



finger (24) Thorellii 



.30. Median stripe distinctly curved backwards in 

 middle. Indistinct ocular spots. Palps minutely 

 granular and hand 15 longer than finger. 

 31. Céphalothorax as broad in the middle as be- 

 hind, as broad as the abdomen, which has no ■ 

 longitudinal line. The hand is 11 broader than '1 

 tibia and deeper than finger is long 



(27) Nicobarensis n. sp. . 



31. Céphalothorax not as broad in the middle as | 



behind and narrower than the abdomen, which 



has an indistinct longitudinal line. The hand 



is narrower than finger is long. ') 



') A. TuUgren has recently published a treatise (22 b), in wliicli he mentions Ch. Birmiiniciis Thor, 

 (pp. 39—40, fifjs. 1 a-f) and gives descriptions of two new species viz. Cb. Kriiepeliiiii Tullg. (pp.40 42, 

 figs. 2 a-d) and Ch. Wabiiryii (pp. 42 4:i, figs. .3 a-b), which do not seem to be identical to any of the 



