218 



REVIEW or AMERICAN BIRDS. 



[part I. 



OPORORNIS, Baikd. 

 Oporornis, Bairp, Birds N. Am. 1858, 246. (Type Si/lvia a(jiUs, Wils.) 



Oporornis agilis. 



Sylvia agilis, Wils. Am. Orn. V, 1S12-, 64, pi. xxxix, fig. 4. — Aud. Orn. 

 Biog. II, pi. 138 ; Bon. — Sylvicolu ay. Jakd. ; Add. B. A. II, pi. 99, 

 — Trichas ag. Nutt. — Oporornis ay. Baikd, Birds N. Am. 1858, 246, 

 pi. Ixxix, fig. 2. — ? Trichas tephrocotis, Nutt. Man. 2d ed. 1840,462 

 (Chester Co., Penn.). 



Hab. Eastern province of United States. 



A specimen in the collection of the Philadelphia Academy, killed 

 by Mr. Krider, has the darker ash of the jugulum of a decided sooty 

 tinffe. 



Locality. 



Whpn 

 Collected. 



Received from 



Collected by 



Philadelphia. 

 Carlisle, Pa. 

 Loudou Co., Va. 

 AVashington. 

 Racine, Wise. 

 Cook Co., 111. 



Oct. 1. '43. 

 May 20, '4.5. 



Sept." 23, '61. 

 May, 1838. 

 May 23, '64. 



S. F. Baird. 



N. Janney. 

 C. E. Schmidt. 

 Dr. Hoy. 

 R. Keuuicott. 



S. F. Baird. 



C. E. Schmidt. 



Dr. Hoy. 



R. Keuuicctt. 



(30,031.) 5.20; 8.90; 2.90. 



Oporornis formosus. 



?, Sylvia sequinoctialift, Vieill. Ois. Am. Sept. II, 1807, 26, pi. 81, Penn. 



(not of Gmelin). 

 Sylvia formosa, Wils. Am. Orn. Ill, 1811, 85, pi. xxv, fig. 3. — Nutt. ; 



Aud. Orn. Biog. I, pi. 38. — Sylvicola formosa, Jard. ; Rich. ; Bon. ; 



Max. Cab. Jour. VI, 1858, 113. — Myiodioctes formosus, Add. Syn. — 



Ib. B. a. II, pi. 74.— Lembeye, Av. Cuba, 1850, 37.— Gundlach, Cab. 



Jour. 1861, 326 (Cuba). — Oporornis formosus, Baikd, Birds N. Am. 



1858, 247.— ScLATER & Salvin, Ibis, I, 1859, 10 (Guatemala). 

 Other Localities Cited: Cuba, Cab. Jour. 111,472. — Mexico, Sclater, 



Pr. 1862, 19. — Isthmus Panama, LaaHexce, Ann. N. Y. Lye. VII, 62. 



Hab. Eastern province of United States, north to Washington and Chicago ; 

 Cuba, Guatemala, and Isthmus Panama. Not recorded from Jamaica and 

 Mexico. 



The Sylvia sequinociialis of Yieillot (but not of Gmelin, which is 

 Geothlypis sequinoct.) probably belongs here. The name, however, 

 is geographically inapplicable, and cannot be retained. 



