424 PRiOCEEDiLNGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol.94 



ally toward the base. The size (leitgth 10.5 mm.; forewing length 6.4 

 mm., breadth 1.8 mm.) is intermediate between that of specimens from 

 the above localities. 



Another specimen at hand from Colombia, without more definite 

 data, is very similar to the above. 



3. One male, Rio Frio, Magdalena, Colombia, June 17 (Darling- 

 ton) (MCZ). 



Head similar to the Venezuelan specimen but shorter, evenly arcuate 

 behind (fig. 31), and much lighter in color. Left tergal process (10 

 LP) (fig. 28) with outer portion not pointed, but irregularly expanded 

 in outline distad. 



PARARHAGADOCHIR TRINITATIS FLAVICOLLIS (Enderlein) 



EmMa fiavicolUs Endeblein, 1909, p. 184.— Kbauss, 1911, p. 68.— NavAs, 1918, 



p. 100. 

 Rhagadocliir fiavicolUs (Enderlein) Enderlein, 1912, pp. 56, 100, figs. 29, 30, pi, 



3,1. 

 Pararhagadochir fiavicolUs (Enderlein) Davis, 1940a, p. 183, figs. 4^50 (after 



Enderlein). 



Holotype. — Male, Stettiner Zoologischen Museum. 



Type data. — Prov. Sara, Bolivia (J. Steinbach). 



Paratype. — Male, with same data and disposition. 



Remarks. — Enderlein's fiavicolUs was based upon specimens from 

 both Bolivia and Venezuela. Since the Bolivian specimens are cited 

 first, following his description, it is assumed that one of these should 

 represent the holotype and thus that the Bolivian locality is to be 

 regarded as the type locality of the subspecies. His specimen from 

 Venezuela probably represented another subspecies as discussed above. 

 Enderlein's original description and figures are inadequate, in the 

 light of present knowledge, to characterize this subspecies, but it is 

 assumed to be distinct because it is the only known Pararhagadochir 

 from Bolivia with a bicolorous thorax. A reexamination of the type 

 will be necessary to confirm the present placement or to determine 

 whether it is not a distinct species. 



PARARHAGADOCHIR TRACHELIA (Navas) 



Figure 32-37 



Rhagadocliir tracheUa Navas, 1915, p. 135, fig. 9. 



Emhia trachelia (Navj'is) Navas, 1918, p. 100, fig. 3 ; 1923a, p. 197 (record) ; 1924a, 



p. 10 (records) ; 1930, p. 72 (record). 

 Pararhagadochir trachelia (Navas) Davis, 1940a, p. 184, figs. 51-GG (part). 



Navas's original description and figures of this species are so lack- 

 ing in essential details that the identification by Davis of specimens 

 appearing to represent the species could only be i^rovisional. There 

 has accordingly been a great need for a redescription of the holotype 



