296 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol. loi 



and Hebard) ; one is from Madera Canyon, Santa Rita Mountains, 

 Ariz., September 10, 1931 (E. R. Tinkham) ; and three are from 

 2 miles southwest of Chiracahua, San Bernardino Valley, Cochise 

 County, Ariz., 4,650 feet elevation, August 27, 1937 (Rehn, Pate, 

 and Rehn) . One female taken at Douglas, Ariz., August 25, 1944, 

 by K. R. Hobbs, is not considered paratypic because lack of asso- 

 ciation with males and uncertainty over its characters make its 

 identity somewhat doubtful. 



Certain of the Arizonan and Sonoran specimens referred to i 

 Conalcaea humphreysii poecila by Ball et al. (1942) and Tink- 

 ham (1947) probably represent cochisei, and possibly those from i 

 Copete Mine, Sonora, also referred to humphreysii by Hebard 1 

 (Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc, vol. 51, p. 291, 1925). The reader is re- 

 ferred to my comments on this subject under Barytettix hum- 

 phreysii and B. poecilus. 



Douglas, the type locality, is just north of the Mexican boundary ' 

 in a small area of the southern desert characterized by the creo- 

 sotebush and the saltbush. Don Luis is located at the south base 

 of the Mule Mountains, about 3 miles southwest of the town of f 

 Bisbee. The Don Luis specimens were taken on "low easy slopes, 

 open with short grass and a scattering of other desertland vegeta- 

 tion, such as ocotillo (Fouquieria), creosotebush, etc.'* 



BARYTETTIX HUMPHREYSII (Thomas) 



Figures 58, a, c, k; 63, e; 64, c, d, j; 65; Plate 11, Figure 1 



Pezotettix humphreysii Thomas, Report of geographical and geological ex- 

 plorations west of the one-hundredth meridian, vol. 5, pp. 890-892, pi. 45, 

 figs. 1, 2, 1875.— Caudell, Ent. News, vol. 22, p. 165, 1911. 



Conalcaea neomexicana Scudder, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 20, pp. 24, 26, 

 pi. 2, fig. 9, 1897; Catalogue of the Orthoptera of the United States and 

 Canada, Proc. Davenport Acad. Nat. Sci., vol. 8, p. 48, 1899. — Bruner, 

 Biologia Centrali-Americana, Orthoptera, vol. 2, p. 305, 1908. — Scudder 

 and Cockerell, Proc. Davenport Acad. Nat. Sci., vol. 9, p. 40, 1902. — 

 Caudell, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 28, p. 476, 1905. — Rehn, Proc. Acad. 

 Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 59, p. 47, 1907. — Kirby, Synonyniic catalogue 

 of Orthoptera, vol. 3, p. 493, 1910. — Rehn and Hebard, Proc. Acad. Nat. 

 Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 64, p. 74, 1912. — Hebard, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. 

 Philadelphia, vol. 69, pp. 264, 275, 1917. 



Barytettix horealis Caudell, Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington, vol. 9, pp. 69-70, 

 1908. — Kirby, Synonymic catalogue of Orthoptera, vol. 3, 585, 1910. — 

 Caudell and Hebard, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 64, p. 162, 

 1912. 



Barytettix neomexicana Scudder, Pierce, and Morrill, Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash- 

 ington, vol. 16, p. 22, 1914. 



Conalcaea humphreysii Thomas, Kirby, Synonymic catalogue of Orthoptera, 

 vol. 3, p. 493, 1910. — Hebard, Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc, vol. 51, pp. 290-291, 

 1925; Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc, vol. 61, p. 300, 1935. — Ball, Tinkham, 

 Flock, and Vorhies, Arizona Agr. Exp. Stat. Techn. Bull. 93, pp. 329- 

 330, 1942.— Tinkham, Amer. Midi. Nat., vol, 38, pp. 146-146, 1947. 



