GRASSHOPPERS OF THE CONALCAEA COMPLEX — GURNEY 299 



however, and aedeagal characters give no indication of subspecific 

 intergradation. 



Type. — Apparently not in existence. 



Type locality. — Southern Arizona. 



In the absence of a type, it is impossible to determine whether 

 the name humphreysii applies to the species here so called or to 

 the one described as cochisei. The former has been collected much 

 oftener, is more widely distributed, and in a sense the usage 

 of earlier workers has been that of earlier revisers. Thomas' origi- 

 nal illustrations clearly show that humphreysii belongs to Bary- 

 tettix rather than to Conalcaea, and I am adopting the view that 

 the more common species was the one first discovered. 



The synonymy of Conalcaea neomexicana Scudder and Barytet- 

 tix borealis Caudell, indicated by Hebard (1935), is fully borne 

 out by my examination of the types. The type of neomexicana., 

 now in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, is a 

 unique male from Silver City, Grant County, N. Mex. Caudell 

 (1908) described borealis from two males taken at the base of the 

 Santa Catalina Mountains, Ariz., and one female without data. 

 A male lectotype, U.S.N.M. No. 1041, was selected by Caudell and 

 Hebard (1912). 



Figure 65. — Distribution of Barytettix humphreysii (Thomas) and B. cochtjci, new 

 species: I B. humphreysii, material examined; D B. humphreysii, localities noted 

 in literature from which I have not seen material; A B. cochisei, material ex- 

 amined. 



