﻿472 
  PROCEEDINGS 
  OF 
  THE 
  NATIONAL 
  MUSEUM 
  vol.96 
  

  

  Oriental 
  fauna 
  that 
  agree 
  with 
  the 
  description 
  of 
  Metophion 
  in 
  all 
  

   but 
  this 
  character 
  and 
  in 
  having 
  the 
  nervulus 
  antefurcal 
  rather 
  than 
  

   postfurcal. 
  They 
  also 
  agree 
  with 
  the 
  description 
  of 
  the 
  genotype 
  

   in 
  the 
  form 
  of 
  the 
  alar 
  scleromes, 
  "einem 
  mondformigen 
  und 
  einem 
  

   gewohnhchen 
  Chitinfleck," 
  that 
  is, 
  a 
  somewhat 
  triangular 
  proximal 
  

   sclerome 
  and 
  a 
  crescentic 
  one 
  on 
  the 
  anterodistal 
  margin 
  of 
  the 
  

   quadra. 
  Another 
  character 
  worthy 
  of 
  special 
  mention 
  in 
  which 
  the 
  

   specimens 
  agree 
  with 
  the 
  generic 
  description 
  is 
  the 
  unusually 
  narrow, 
  

   sometimes 
  alm^ost 
  pointed, 
  base 
  of 
  the 
  second 
  discoidal 
  cell. 
  On 
  the 
  

   strength 
  of 
  these 
  facts 
  I 
  synonymize 
  Metophion 
  with 
  Enicospilus. 
  

  

  I 
  have 
  not 
  seen 
  the 
  genotype 
  of 
  Ceratospilufi 
  Sz6pligeti, 
  but 
  certain 
  

   Philippine 
  specimens 
  of 
  Enicospilus 
  agree 
  in 
  all 
  but 
  the 
  postfurcal 
  

   nervulus, 
  and 
  this 
  is 
  too 
  subject 
  to 
  variation 
  for 
  recognition 
  as 
  a 
  generic 
  

   character. 
  

  

  Neither 
  the 
  medially 
  thickened 
  discocubitus 
  nor 
  the 
  lack 
  of 
  scle- 
  

   romes 
  is 
  sufficient 
  to 
  segregate 
  Atoponeura 
  Sz^pligeti 
  as 
  a 
  genus 
  dis- 
  

   tinct 
  from 
  Enicospilus. 
  An 
  unidentified 
  species 
  of 
  Enicospilus 
  from 
  

   the 
  Oriental 
  Region 
  exhibits 
  these 
  two 
  characters 
  (pi. 
  55, 
  fig. 
  67). 
  

  

  It 
  seems 
  doubtful 
  that 
  Sz^pligeti 
  knew 
  the 
  designated 
  genotype 
  of 
  

   Ophiomorpha, 
  although 
  he 
  included 
  it 
  originally. 
  In 
  describing 
  

   Ophion 
  curvinervis, 
  Cameron 
  stated, 
  and 
  his 
  figure 
  shows, 
  that 
  the 
  

   basal 
  abscissa 
  of 
  the 
  radius 
  is 
  distinctly 
  curved, 
  which 
  would 
  preclude 
  

   its 
  tracing 
  to 
  Ophiomorpha 
  in 
  Sz6pligeti's 
  key 
  and 
  its 
  agreement 
  with 
  

   the 
  original 
  description 
  of 
  the 
  genus. 
  I 
  have 
  examined 
  two 
  specimens 
  

   of 
  Ophiomorpha 
  concolor 
  Szepligeti,^^ 
  the 
  most 
  logical 
  choice 
  for 
  

   genotype, 
  identified 
  by 
  Seyrig, 
  and 
  find 
  that 
  it 
  has 
  the 
  basal 
  abscissa 
  

   straight, 
  only 
  slightly 
  thickened 
  and 
  very 
  gradually 
  tapering 
  from 
  

   base 
  to 
  apex; 
  also, 
  the 
  fenestra 
  is 
  obsolescent, 
  being 
  represented 
  only 
  

   by 
  a 
  small 
  hairless 
  area 
  in 
  the 
  normal 
  position 
  of 
  the 
  fenestra. 
  Un- 
  

   fortunately, 
  in 
  describing 
  curvinervis 
  Cameron 
  refers 
  to 
  the 
  fenestra 
  

   only 
  with 
  the 
  observation 
  that 
  the 
  wings 
  lack 
  scleromes. 
  

  

  Cryptocamptus 
  Brethes 
  was 
  proposed 
  as 
  a 
  substitute 
  for 
  Allo- 
  

   camptus 
  Thomson, 
  not 
  Foerster, 
  its 
  author 
  not 
  realizing 
  that 
  Cyma- 
  

   toneura 
  was 
  already 
  available. 
  

  

  In 
  describing 
  Eremotyloides 
  in 
  a 
  key 
  to 
  genera, 
  Perkins 
  did 
  not 
  

   indicate 
  any 
  type 
  except 
  inferentially. 
  On 
  page 
  529 
  of 
  the 
  paper 
  in 
  

   which 
  the 
  genus 
  was 
  described 
  (p. 
  530) 
  he 
  stated, 
  "I 
  have 
  not 
  seen 
  

   the 
  typical 
  species 
  of 
  Eremotylus, 
  Forst., 
  and 
  I 
  think 
  that 
  Ashmead 
  is 
  

   wrong 
  in 
  attributing 
  the 
  one 
  variable 
  Hawaiian 
  species 
  to 
  it." 
  On 
  

   page 
  532 
  in 
  a 
  discussion 
  of 
  the 
  variation 
  of 
  Hawaiian 
  Ophionini 
  he 
  

   employs 
  the 
  combination 
  "Eremotyloides 
  orbitalis" 
  without 
  giving 
  the 
  

   author 
  of 
  the 
  species, 
  but 
  it 
  seems 
  entirely 
  clear 
  that 
  Eremotylus 
  

  

  " 
  {Ophiomorpha 
  concolor 
  Sz§pllgeti, 
  preoccupied 
  in 
  Enicospilus 
  by 
  E. 
  concolor 
  Cresson) 
  =EniscospUut 
  

   parvifenestratus, 
  new 
  name. 
  

  

  