﻿GENERIC 
  REVISION 
  OF 
  THE 
  OPIIIONINI 
  — 
  CUSHMAN 
  473 
  

  

  orbitalifi 
  Ashmcad 
  is 
  intended 
  as 
  the 
  genotype 
  of 
  Eremotyl 
  aides, 
  and 
  

   Viereck 
  so 
  interpreted 
  it. 
  In 
  the 
  reference 
  cited 
  above 
  I 
  have 
  treated 
  

   Eremntyloides 
  as 
  a 
  subgenus 
  of 
  Enicospilus 
  showing 
  that 
  the 
  fenestra 
  

   may 
  be 
  large 
  or 
  small 
  and 
  with 
  or 
  without 
  sclcromes. 
  A 
  part 
  of 
  the 
  

   wing 
  of 
  EnkospHns 
  (Eremotyloides) 
  fullawayi 
  Cushman 
  is 
  illustrated 
  

   herewith 
  (pi. 
  55, 
  fig. 
  65). 
  

  

  Amesospilns 
  Enderlein 
  is 
  another 
  segregate 
  from 
  Enicospilus 
  based 
  

   on 
  a 
  wing 
  character, 
  the 
  lack 
  of 
  central 
  scleromcs, 
  which 
  it 
  shares 
  

   with 
  many 
  otherwise 
  very 
  divei"se 
  species. 
  

  

  Schisospilus 
  Seyiig 
  is 
  a 
  frankly 
  artificial 
  genus 
  distinguished 
  from 
  

   Enicospilus 
  solely 
  by 
  the 
  possession 
  of 
  two 
  or 
  more 
  scleromes 
  on 
  the 
  

   quadra. 
  

  

  GENERA 
  OF 
  OPHIONINI 
  NOT 
  INCLUDED 
  IN 
  THIS 
  REVISION 
  

   Genus 
  BARYTATOCEPHALUS 
  Schuiz 
  

  

  Banjcephalus 
  Brauxs, 
  Term^sz. 
  Fiizet., 
  vol. 
  18, 
  p. 
  43, 
  1895. 
  — 
  Sz6pligeti, 
  in 
  

   Wyt-sman, 
  Genera 
  inscctorum, 
  fasc. 
  34, 
  p. 
  24, 
  1905. 
  — 
  Schmiedeknecht, 
  

   Opiiscula 
  ichncumoiiologica, 
  fasc. 
  18, 
  p. 
  1426, 
  1908; 
  suppl., 
  fasc. 
  24, 
  p. 
  15, 
  

   1935. 
  — 
  Shestakov, 
  Konowia, 
  vol. 
  5, 
  p. 
  257, 
  1926 
  (preoccupied 
  by 
  Bary- 
  

   cephalus 
  Giinther, 
  1860). 
  (Genotype: 
  Darycephalns 
  mocsaryi 
  Brauns. 
  By 
  

   designation 
  of 
  Viereck, 
  U. 
  S. 
  Nat. 
  Mus. 
  Bull. 
  83, 
  p. 
  19, 
  1914.] 
  

  

  Barytatocephalus 
  Schulz, 
  ZooI. 
  Ann., 
  vol. 
  4, 
  p. 
  23, 
  (1909) 
  1911 
  (substitute 
  name 
  

   for 
  Barycephalmt 
  Brauns, 
  preoccupied). 
  [Genotype: 
  Barytalocephalus 
  moc- 
  

   saryi 
  Brauns.] 
  Autobasic. 
  

  

  The 
  possession 
  of 
  the 
  postpectoral 
  carina, 
  the 
  weakly 
  broken 
  but 
  

   strongly 
  rcclivous 
  nervellus, 
  and 
  the 
  large 
  head 
  are 
  suggestive 
  of 
  

   Clvitorapha 
  Cushman, 
  but 
  the 
  very 
  small 
  eyes 
  and 
  ocelli, 
  the 
  short 
  

   antennae, 
  the 
  unseparated 
  clypeus, 
  the 
  lack 
  of 
  notaulices, 
  the 
  e.x- 
  

   carinate 
  and 
  polished 
  propodeum, 
  and 
  the 
  strongly 
  contrasting 
  color 
  

   pattern 
  of 
  Barytatoccphalus 
  ai)pear 
  to 
  distinguish 
  it. 
  

  

  The 
  genus 
  is 
  still 
  known 
  only 
  from 
  the 
  two 
  original 
  Hungarian 
  

   species. 
  Brauns 
  suggested 
  that 
  his 
  two 
  species 
  might 
  be 
  the 
  se.xes 
  

   of 
  the 
  same 
  species, 
  but 
  Shestakov, 
  in 
  describing 
  the 
  male 
  of 
  sominiger 
  

   Brauns, 
  showed 
  them 
  to 
  be 
  distinct. 
  

  

  Genus 
  DICTYONOTUS 
  Kriechbaumer 
  

  

  Dir.tyonotus 
  KniEciiBAL'.MER, 
  Zool. 
  Jahrb. 
  Hyst., 
  vol. 
  8, 
  p. 
  197, 
  1894. 
  (Genotype: 
  

   Ophion 
  (fJictyoriolita) 
  vielanaHus 
  Kriechbaumer.) 
  Monobasic. 
  

  

  Elsewhere 
  in 
  this 
  revision 
  I 
  have 
  indicated 
  the 
  possible 
  synonjmiy 
  

   of 
  this 
  genus 
  and 
  Aglaophion 
  Cameron. 
  1 
  have 
  not 
  seen 
  the 
  genotype 
  

   unless 
  it 
  is 
  i)crhaps 
  synonymous 
  with 
  Aglaophion 
  purpurascens 
  (Smith), 
  

   which 
  possibility 
  several 
  of 
  the 
  characters 
  listed 
  by 
  Kriechbaumer 
  

   would 
  seem 
  to 
  preclude; 
  melanarius 
  is 
  considerably 
  smaller 
  than 
  any 
  

   specimen 
  of 
  purpurascens 
  that 
  I 
  have 
  seen, 
  \\ 
  liile 
  the 
  coarsely 
  sculp- 
  

   tured 
  and 
  mat 
  thora.x 
  and 
  sharply 
  defined 
  triangular 
  basal 
  area 
  of 
  

   the 
  propodeum 
  apparently 
  would 
  distinguish 
  it. 
  Most 
  significant 
  of 
  

  

  